I quite like the first solution. The hallway is not too big – rather the guest bathroom. In my opinion, the open hallway here is uncomfortable. I would separate the entrance area + hallway from the living area with drywall.
I don’t like your changes. They turn the study into a narrow room that doesn’t need the space. The wardrobe is much more important.
We also tend emotionally towards the first solution. One possibility for the guest bathroom in variant 1 would be to integrate the shower into the larger left part of the bathroom and then plan a storage room instead of the shower. The hallway could be separated from the dining room with drywall and a glass door.
What have you planned for the staircase? At the moment, it does not belong to the living area, is probably unheated, and has the charm of a corridor in a medical office, right? If I were planning to connect the upper and ground floors, I would include the staircase in the design and possibly make it open to the wardrobe. Is anything planned there?
Exactly, the staircase is unheated but is supposed to get a radiator in the basement and new flooring everywhere (wood or tiles). There were also architect drafts to move the staircase more to the center of the house, but that would be too expensive, and the upper floor would have to be completely redesigned as well. Possibly planned is to widen the passage between the staircase and the hallway from 0.9 m to about 1.2 m so that it, together with the hallway, feels more like one room.
My suggestion would be: leave the old children's room as is where the kitchen is now and use it as guest/office; then have kitchen and dining adjacent; and put the living room where the guest/office is in the new plan.
Kitchen as two rows with a freestanding island, no U-shape. That way you have direct access to the terrace and the living room is nicely cozy away from the walking zone.
Does the short wall in the middle have to stay, or could the static requirements also be met by a beam? Then I would do it that way. Also remove the opposite short wall from the exterior wall.
Should the windows stay as they are? What condition are they currently in anyway?
The short wall in the middle already resulted from a previous breakthrough. There is already a beam above the 2.00 m opening. The wall was closed before, as in the old upper floor plan. If one were to remove the short wall in addition to the planned breakthrough of the large wall, there would be hardly any load-bearing walls left on the ground floor. And in the current variant, we like it if the living room is half separated from the dining room.
The living room should definitely stay in the south (for example bottom left on the plan). The room is very bright with large windows and terrace access.
My wife likes the kitchen by the terrace, hence the study in the north (top left on the plan). We don’t have guests often. 1-2 nights per month. That would be okay if they go through the dining room to get to the bathroom. There would also be a possibility for guests to stay overnight on the upper floor (old upper floor children’s room).
Individual windows could be moved if it brings a big advantage.
The stove connection is often also a cable that isn’t routed multiple times through the house.
The electrical wiring throughout the ground floor will be newly installed. It’s heading towards a full renovation. A floor heating will also be installed.
Is the entrance really through the garage? Is that supposed to stay that way?
You can see now in the picture in the previous post that the entrance goes from the yard into the covered windbreak and then into the house.