Mizit
2016-03-22 16:35:14
- #1
The focus here is intentionally not on the plot and the possible positioning of the house, but of course, that will also play a role in the final decision if this provider is chosen. From a purely technical construction perspective, both variants would initially be possible on our desired plot.
We are interested in the Signum house from Kern (227,000 euros).
Then, closely selected, is the Aura house: (253,000 euros).
Both prices refer to the turnkey expansion stage.
If I look purely visually, I prefer Aura. This is also due to this red "inset," which of course is not a standard color plaster and which we would have to pay for separately. (What do you think, will this special plaster cost...?)
The living area of Signum would offer us 152 sqm, Aura 158. I find that rather insignificant at first... So purely in terms of living space, I don’t find 26,000 € more “justified” for us.
We are 2 adults, have 2 small children, a third child not yet decided, we definitely need an office, a guest room is nice to have, it would certainly be used more often as a playroom on the ground floor. Currently, we are not necessarily planning a basement. I want the kitchen to be closed off, which the provider says would be possible without problems in both houses.
Here is a comparison of the room sizes:
SIGNUM: AURA:
Living/Dining: 31.15 Living/Dining: 32.53
Guest: 12.15 Guest: 10.1
Kitchen: 10.81 Kitchen: 11.40
Hallway: 12.91 Hallway: 14.86 + 2.20 second hallway
Guest WC: 4.61 Guest WC: 4.98
Utility/Technical room: 9.18 Utility room: 10.41
Children’s room 1: 13.33 Child 1: 11.44
Children’s room 2: 14.11 Child 2: 11.44
Office: 10.25 Office: 11.01
Family bathroom: 12.69 Family bathroom: 11.05
Parents’ room: 11.29 Parents’ room: 11.98
Upstairs hallway: 7.19 Upstairs hallway: 8.38
House AURA has a dressing room in the parents’ room of 6 sqm.
Essentially, with my layman’s view, it’s about the same, isn’t it?
Considering the size of the children’s rooms, Signum is somewhat more generous; just under 11 sqm is not very much, right?
Regarding the dressing room, I don’t really know if we need something like that. Certainly nice to have if money and space are no object at all. But so far our normal wardrobe worked... our next bed will definitely have a bed box that can relieve the wardrobe. Questionable whether we might use the intended dressing room as a sauna? Or: Are 6 sqm enough for an office? As long as a desk + chair and a large shelf (preferably tall rather than wide) fit in, that’s enough for me. Only I need an office. Then the children might still be able to use the room planned as an office upstairs for themselves and play stuff?
Do you think the Aura house is significantly brighter than Signum because of this panorama dormer or whatever it’s called? Lots of light is obviously nice...
Or do you find the extra cost of Aura over Signum with the same basic equipment rather unjustified?
We are interested in the Signum house from Kern (227,000 euros).
Then, closely selected, is the Aura house: (253,000 euros).
Both prices refer to the turnkey expansion stage.
If I look purely visually, I prefer Aura. This is also due to this red "inset," which of course is not a standard color plaster and which we would have to pay for separately. (What do you think, will this special plaster cost...?)
The living area of Signum would offer us 152 sqm, Aura 158. I find that rather insignificant at first... So purely in terms of living space, I don’t find 26,000 € more “justified” for us.
We are 2 adults, have 2 small children, a third child not yet decided, we definitely need an office, a guest room is nice to have, it would certainly be used more often as a playroom on the ground floor. Currently, we are not necessarily planning a basement. I want the kitchen to be closed off, which the provider says would be possible without problems in both houses.
Here is a comparison of the room sizes:
SIGNUM: AURA:
Living/Dining: 31.15 Living/Dining: 32.53
Guest: 12.15 Guest: 10.1
Kitchen: 10.81 Kitchen: 11.40
Hallway: 12.91 Hallway: 14.86 + 2.20 second hallway
Guest WC: 4.61 Guest WC: 4.98
Utility/Technical room: 9.18 Utility room: 10.41
Children’s room 1: 13.33 Child 1: 11.44
Children’s room 2: 14.11 Child 2: 11.44
Office: 10.25 Office: 11.01
Family bathroom: 12.69 Family bathroom: 11.05
Parents’ room: 11.29 Parents’ room: 11.98
Upstairs hallway: 7.19 Upstairs hallway: 8.38
House AURA has a dressing room in the parents’ room of 6 sqm.
Essentially, with my layman’s view, it’s about the same, isn’t it?
Considering the size of the children’s rooms, Signum is somewhat more generous; just under 11 sqm is not very much, right?
Regarding the dressing room, I don’t really know if we need something like that. Certainly nice to have if money and space are no object at all. But so far our normal wardrobe worked... our next bed will definitely have a bed box that can relieve the wardrobe. Questionable whether we might use the intended dressing room as a sauna? Or: Are 6 sqm enough for an office? As long as a desk + chair and a large shelf (preferably tall rather than wide) fit in, that’s enough for me. Only I need an office. Then the children might still be able to use the room planned as an office upstairs for themselves and play stuff?
Do you think the Aura house is significantly brighter than Signum because of this panorama dormer or whatever it’s called? Lots of light is obviously nice...
Or do you find the extra cost of Aura over Signum with the same basic equipment rather unjustified?