Financing through building savings? I don't see the catch.

  • Erstellt am 2013-06-02 18:05:27

ViciousJake

2013-06-15 11:01:02
  • #1
According to the consultant, the bank's response is now available. The property is being completely revalued according to "Basel III," which throws a wrench in our plans. Now the interest rate drops from 2.6% to 3.25% because a different loan-to-value ratio applies. Calculated over the term, that amounts to 42,000 euros if we plan without special repayments. We are at our wit's end, constant setbacks...
 

DerBjoern

2013-06-15 15:01:39
  • #2
That is quite intense. I would get quotes from somewhere else again.
 

ViciousJake

2013-06-15 15:15:38
  • #3
Well, in the end it’s even 3.3%, of course we will get a different consultation again. Especially since our "consultation" "can" not forward us the justification to read through. On Monday we’re going back to the house bank, let’s see if they can’t undercut the new offer that our "consultation" wants to send us on Monday. In parallel, we’re looking ourselves and requesting the written justification from the bank. Slowly I really feel f***ed. Already wasted so much time that we have to extend the financing contingency with the provider....
 

emer

2013-06-15 17:52:48
  • #4
But I'm surprised, since Basel III has been in effect since early 2013, what happened before that? The equity capital is not that low either, so how do they now arrive at an interest rate jump of 0.65%?
 

emer

2013-06-15 17:56:36
  • #5
Furthermore: Basel III does not change/regulate the interest rate / the loan-to-value ratio. It only requires banks to build up more equity. Of course, the banks pass this on to the customer (if little or no equity is available). But such a "miscalculation" is strange.

What percentage loan-to-value was actually applied in your case?
 

ViciousJake

2013-06-15 18:08:16
  • #6
According to our advisor and our calculation, we had a loan-to-value ratio of just under 72%.
Breakdown
1. Land is valued at 37,313 euros (rounded to full euros)
2. Construction costs according to the contract then add 300,865 euros
3. Outdoor facilities flat rate of 15,000 euros added
4. Other incidental construction costs, but without kitchen, probably 33,000 euros
5. Additional electricity flat rate of 5,000 euros
6. Stove and sauna at full price 13,500 euros

Total sum thus 404,678 euros

For a loan amount of 290,000 euros.

However, the bank apparently assumes such a depreciation that it arrives at a loan portion of just under 88%.
The basic condition at the bank is 2.6% and for loans over 100k€ a further reduction of 0.1%. This is how the 2.6% came about. For loan-to-value ratios between 80 and 90%, 0.7% is added (for 72-80% it would be 0.4%).

So my sparse information.
 

Similar topics
19.02.2013Is a Riester loan useful for my case?13
30.04.2012No equity, good income, financing feasible?22
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
20.06.2013Problems with equity - real estate purchase15
02.09.2013Loan of EUR 500,000 - possible with monthly income?17
16.01.2014Problems with bank - equity10
02.08.2014Does the bank require our own equity when taking out a loan?11
04.09.2014How to use equity14
16.02.2015Property purchased - Is financing/loan for house possible?13
18.02.2015How much equity is used when purchasing land?13
22.02.2015KfW loan as equity capital. Which bank does this?15
07.04.2015Loans and Construction Credit - Creating KfW Usage Evidence11
22.06.2015Land price = complete equity. Finance yes/no?13
10.07.2015Does our financing match our capabilities?42
18.02.2016Collateral value & equity11
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
26.07.2016Calculation of equity capital in connection with KfW loan28
24.10.2018Decision aid: special repayment or saving equity for a single-family house?23
17.09.2019Building a house without equity - is that possible?117
29.12.2020Variable loan possible / sensible?155

Oben