Financing new construction of a single-family house in the Greater Munich area

Share of industrial value added in GDP

Isn't that more because the service sector has simply become so much stronger? Calling it "deindustrialization" seems a bit overdramatic to me. To me, that sounds like we all have to look again at where to get enough food.
Take Austria as an example (the chart is from Wikipedia, from the page "Economic sector")

The red is the industrial sector, the blue the service sector. So I don't really see "deindustrialization" there, even if the percentage share of industry has decreased.

edit: Sorry for being off-topic, but I just found it kind of absurd.

That every thread eventually has to drift into the conspiracy corner of the AfD, claiming the Greens have a secret plan to destroy the industry...

Oh, when people can no longer come up with factual arguments, sad.....

Common denominator with the conspiracy nuts: Include large photovoltaics with storage

If possible, omit the basement and definitely the double garage. Cars are made to spend the night outside, it doesn't bother them. This way you easily save 120,000 EUR. If you build with a basement, you could reduce the house size by 15-20% because all the technology fits in the basement and you can also store a lot of stuff there that would otherwise have to go in cabinets inside the house. Then you can almost pay for the place in cash. Great, right?

If green voter, then definitely the double garage. You need more space for the larger photovoltaics....

Isn't this rather due to the fact that the service sector has simply become much stronger? Speaking of "deindustrialization" now seems a bit overdramatic to me. It sounds to me like we all have to look again where to get enough food. For example Austria (the graphic is from Wikipedia on the page "Economic sector") The red is the industrial sector, the blue the service sector. So I don't really see "deindustrialization" there even though the percentage share of industry has become smaller. edit: Sorry for off-topic, but I just found that somehow very absurd.

You do know that the "service sector" is often close to minimum wage and thus doesn't really enable a good standard of living? ALSO: What is the point of the comparison with Austria?

You are aware that the service sector in the graphic has absolutely nothing to do with minimum wage earners as service providers?

You are aware that the "service sector" is often close to minimum wage and therefore does not really allow a good standard of living? ALSO: What's the point of the comparison with Austria?

Well, no, the service sector also includes things like insurance, doctors, tax consultants, telecommunications, and trade. Salaries there don't look so bad in some cases. Of course, there are also low earners. I mean things like nursing and educators, etc., who have long been fighting for higher pay, should also be counted among them. In itself, the development toward a service society is rather seen as a sign of a highly developed economy. It can of course be criticized that this is all happening too fast and that we would need more industry and/or that half of the service sector would be job creation measures or whatever. But my point would be more that our industry is so efficient that we have the possibility to focus on services ;) Summoning doomsday scenarios due to deindustrialization simply seems absurd to me. Austria as an example had no special reason, except that it was the first example I quickly found. Shame on my head :)