Ulli79
2015-08-15 10:35:26
- #1
Hello everyone! We are planning with an architect and planning to build a single-family house of about 140sqm (shed roof, without a basement). We have a plot of land (about 24x19m) that is oriented in such a way that if the house were placed normally facing the street, it would have a north-facing garden (the plot has the 19m side along the street). Now the architect has designed a really nice, "architecturally appealing" building for us, which is rather narrow in terms of building volume, with the following exterior dimensions: 5.90 x 16.15m, with the narrow side facing the street (thus facing south). Very narrow, but this way we can create a beautiful west garden with a great terrace. We like the floor plan, the room layout also accommodates everything as we like it. The roof would slope to the east. BUT: We are pondering the rather narrow building. After all, energy-efficient building is quite popular these days and we think the energy aspect should not be taken lightly. Reading on the internet, shed roofs, whether for energy saving or generation, are mostly oriented north or south. Furthermore, a narrow building tends to lose energy more easily than a more square one, right? Also, planning to install a solar thermal system on the garage unsettles us. Is all this worth the west garden? Or wouldn’t a completely conventional building be smarter after all?! If you need more information, just ask! Thanks already!