Developer refuses to hand over documents

My speech.
That someone gets outraged about someone else’s work is considered normal in construction.
Then there is a construction layperson who does not approve of the visual impression of a shell construction.
This can be anything and nothing at the same time.

That can be anything and nothing now.

In principle, I agree with you. However, my overall impression, also based on , is that fundamental things are going wrong there.

Is a photo coming?

Hello,

sorry, I have been very busy with work and can only get back to you now.
Attached are some photos of the interior walls, partly huge gaps, partly crooked and not properly anchored. For us, definitely not professional.
The head of our BT company has now agreed to meet with us at the construction site to discuss the problems. In this context, we will also look at the installation of the interior walls.

By now, I really suspect that the company simply does not know exactly which customers they are general contractors for and which they are BT for. That explains the many contradictory statements and various "back and forth" actions.

Attached are some photos of the interior walls, partly huge gaps, partly crooked and not properly anchored. For us definitely not professional.

I only dislike that the wall on the left in picture 0951 is probably at the limit of the plumb deviation according to DIN. I cannot clearly tell whether it is calcium silicate brick or aerated concrete; with the former, not tying in the walls might be acceptable, but also less so not anchoring them. The gaps themselves are not so dramatic, we are talking about interior walls here. For exterior walls, the botched spots would be filled with mortar, but even there are technically probably not considered defects. For interior walls, one might want to leave it to the plasterer to bridge it with mesh. In my overall impression, it remains that I do not hold your BT-GU in high regard beyond distance - but the pictures also support the view that you see the situation as more dramatic than it is: what you see appears average and typical for construction.

but the pictures also support the view that you see the situation as more dramatic than it is: what you see looks average and typical for construction.

Really? Honestly, I find the pictures shocking... that is supposed to be normal? None of our walls look even remotely like that. Sure, some aerated concrete blocks have a corner chipped off here and there, and there are tiny gaps between blocks now and then, but absolutely nothing comparable to the pictures shown here.