Developer refuses to hand over documents

I honestly find the pictures frightening... that's supposed to be normal?

During the final acceptance you don’t see any of this anymore, but we simply KNOW how terrible the walls underneath look.

Have I already mentioned that I come from a butcher dynasty on my father's side?

I believe it was Bismarck who is said to have said: it is better if people don’t know exactly how sausages and laws are made. Did I already mention that I come from a butcher dynasty on my father’s side? – in any case: back then, when the buyers of property development projects still adhered to this saying, there were simply fewer smartphone photos of the nonchalant handling of the material by the builders, but under the plaster it was basically the same "let it slide" attitude as today – only that during boom times the level of botched work increases accordingly. I too see conditions in the pictures that would make me, as the Queen, not amused – but I also know that construction sites are no havens of finesse. At five o’clock it’s quitting time, crooked or not.

I fear unofficial knowledge is not relevant for acceptance protocols. A “defect” is what is recognizable as unprofessional or not in accordance with standards during acceptance; what only becomes evident after the warranty period is a “hidden defect.” In this sense, these are “no” defects – no matter how much they may rob the philosopher of sleep.

Mr. Hoeneß, is that you? Now a lot is becoming clear to me -_-

I think it’s time to say that flowery euphemisms and your exaggerated satirical stories, which do not describe reality, do not belong to the added value of this forum.

Mr. Hoeneß, is that you? Now a lot becomes clear to me -_-