And yet there is more truth in house building than you are trying to talk me out of right now.
Again. No. The market is currently enormously driven by supply and demand. A craftsman or BU with full order books inevitably charges different prices than someone who urgently needs orders right now.
Is that positive for Dacia or for Audi now?
Positive for whoever can utilize synergy effects. For Audi, that's its developed MBQ; for Dacia, the fact that a Renault Clio is inside the Duster. If Audi, for example, had to completely redevelop all system components of an A3 from scratch, the finished product would be significantly more expensive than an MBQ-A3. At the same quality/performance. Saying volume, cross-subsidization, ROI.
The overhead also has to be controlled. Audi is a premium partner of FC Bayern; for Dacia, Scholl antics on the Sportschau commercial break over the screen. The different marketing costs that must be covered again do not directly flow into a quality or performance difference.
Of course there is a difference in price, quality, and workmanship.
To stick to the (really bad) example of the automotive industry:
VW Up!, Skoda Citigo, Seat Mii. - All VW120 -
Three times the same car with minimal design differences, all of which come from the same factory, which can switch models within a shift. The manufacturing costs for the different manufacturers probably differ by only a single-digit euro amount at most, yet the car with the VW label is between €1000 and €2000 (depending on the equipment version) more expensive than the Seat, i.e. 10 - 20%. Differences here are found maximally in brand image and target group. Quality, workmanship, material... SameSame