Construction financing, 2 borrowers

  • Erstellt am 2016-02-05 13:37:52

PH0110

2016-02-11 15:40:33
  • #1
No children are planned for the time being. If there are any, then there will be maintenance payments etc., but that's a different story now. Who says that the woman stays at home full-time and takes care of the children? From a financial point of view, it makes sense for my girlfriend to stay [zH] for the time being, but we will see when the time comes... When children come into play, the time the person staying [zH] would be credited as if the payments had continued. Increase/decrease in the value of the property would be credited in equal parts according to the payments made towards the property. I know, this is very complicated. However, my girlfriend herself also wants everything to be precisely regulated... But where does one start and where does one stop?
 

Jochen104

2016-02-11 16:02:03
  • #2
From how it sounds with you, you would probably be better off having separate arrangements: You buy the house and take out the loan and she pays you monthly rent. If children then come, this rent can be suspended. Done.
 

Yaso2.0

2016-02-11 16:18:56
  • #3


I agree

I can understand wanting to safeguard yourself just in case. But here it seems to be about every single amount, which to me would already be too much of well-intentioned "protection."
 

PH0110

2016-02-11 18:16:47
  • #4
In my opinion, it would be better and also feasible. My personal suggestion was initially to set 100% on me, and in the notarial deed to stipulate that once 50% of the loan can be taken out in a few years, it can be taken out and then registered equally in the land register. There is only the word "Miete" ([Kostenpauschale]), which should be paid until then, and if the relationship still exists, of course, it will be credited, in the way. If the relationship fails after X years (which I certainly do not hope!!!), she wants this [Kostenpauschale] back. Which I find not correct. What is your opinion on this?
 

Schemelino

2016-02-11 19:54:03
  • #5
In your position, I would leave everything as it is. No trust, only self-protection, that's all I can read here. Counting working hours for raising children....
 

costa

2016-02-11 20:02:20
  • #6
What does that have to do with trust? If you don’t clarify such matters beforehand, you end up with a much bigger problem afterwards. I think it’s good to openly discuss possible scenarios. If the worst-case scenario doesn’t happen, everything is fine.
 

Similar topics
27.10.2008Mold - Rent Reduction?11
24.05.2013Build big? Or continue renting?23
18.03.2015Buying property feasible - Loan with building savings as equity?12
28.09.2015Take more credit or sell?22
25.04.2016High equity, low income: to build or not?47
03.09.2016Own property right from the start? A beginner needs straight talk...44
21.03.2018Consideration and feasibility of buying or constructing a property15
13.11.2018Grandma's house | Right of residence | Rent by oneself15
22.04.2019Real estate loan with high collateral but low ongoing income35
18.04.2019Buy a second property - on existing mortgage25
10.07.2019Calculations on the annoying topic of buying/building vs. renting19
16.08.2019What loan amount is realistic for house construction?190
01.02.2020Paying "rent" to the partner... how?135
18.07.2020Desire for joint property - currently separated95
05.01.2021Renovation of an apartment in the parental home - loan, without being the owner?11
11.06.2022Use of Credit vs. Equity41
08.11.2023Vision House No. 3: Is property lending possible for credit?13
16.02.2024Property in good condition financable?90
04.03.20242 buyers - 1 property - different amounts of money - owner?45
10.07.2024Land financing, variable loan?20

Oben