Hi,
now it’s getting off-topic, but nonetheless:
Aside from the fact that I would never sign such a contract, can a general contractor legally lock out the owner at all? *looking dumb*
This is not a rental (as a landlord I of course am not allowed to just enter the apartment) but I commission the general contractor to work for me. It is clear and logical that I walk at my own risk on a possibly unsecured construction site and that only the site manager has authority over the craftsmen. For that, the site manager has to answer to me...
That is usually enough, to pay the ongoing rent; also a temporary holiday apartment.
If you think that providers enjoy letting a construction site lie dormant, you are naive
But it should not only be enough for a holiday apartment and that also costs well over 50 €/night for 4 people.
Here in the Nuremberg area it can get pretty bad during trade fair times, you easily pay 500 euros a night for 2 hotel rooms. And that’s not even the Sheraton...
On top of that there is a lot more: storing furniture; two moves, so one more than planned, possibly more driving around, etc...
Such a contractual penalty is supposed to put some pressure and motivation on the general contractor to make progress quickly. I see on our own site every week that people just let the site lie dormant casually.
Today the scaffolder came: a full 10 days late.
The painter stood us up today, comes Wednesday or Thursday, if you believe it.
The electrician only reconnected the construction power supply in the house after 2 weeks of constant calls, after the construction power box outside had to be disconnected... etc...
Currently they are just working on whatever is most lucrative and not what was agreed in the schedule.
At work I could (could, don’t have to because this doesn’t happen there) throw such suppliers out on their ear (after sending all the lawyers of hell on them) here unfortunately I can’t...
Best regards,
Andreas