Cango30
2017-04-20 23:53:20
- #1
Good evening everyone,
I am new to the forum and hope you can help me with my concern. Unfortunately, I could not find a similar case using the search function.
A few weeks ago, I was specifically interested in a planned new semi-detached house, which according to the construction company should meet the requirements of KFW-55. The real estate agent and the developer recommended a service provider for arranging financing, whom I then contacted.
The responsible consultant requested various documents about the property for a loan including KfW funding – which I in turn requested from the construction company. Among these documents was the KfW online confirmation (so-called confirmation for the application (BZA)). The developer briefly mentioned to me in a general phone call that the application process would involve costs. However, these would only be due if no contract was concluded. I assumed this was a small amount and did not give it much thought. I also did not give him explicit consent on the phone. In any case, I received the form a few hours later.
Unfortunately, the financing did not work out. Two weeks later, I found an invoice for €351.05 from the construction company in my mailbox. They are charging a fee for filling out the online form. I then wrote an email to the developer stating that I would not comply with the demand, as there was never any agreement. If he had told me on the phone that it would cost about €350, I probably would have hung up immediately. Today, I received a letter from a law firm. They are demanding that I pay the amount plus €70 in legal fees.
Has anyone had similar experiences and can tell me whether the construction company is entitled to the claim?
I am not a lawyer, but I believe that the construction company is obliged to provide proof as a prerequisite that the new building will meet the Kfw55 requirements.
Thank you in advance!
Cango30
I am new to the forum and hope you can help me with my concern. Unfortunately, I could not find a similar case using the search function.
A few weeks ago, I was specifically interested in a planned new semi-detached house, which according to the construction company should meet the requirements of KFW-55. The real estate agent and the developer recommended a service provider for arranging financing, whom I then contacted.
The responsible consultant requested various documents about the property for a loan including KfW funding – which I in turn requested from the construction company. Among these documents was the KfW online confirmation (so-called confirmation for the application (BZA)). The developer briefly mentioned to me in a general phone call that the application process would involve costs. However, these would only be due if no contract was concluded. I assumed this was a small amount and did not give it much thought. I also did not give him explicit consent on the phone. In any case, I received the form a few hours later.
Unfortunately, the financing did not work out. Two weeks later, I found an invoice for €351.05 from the construction company in my mailbox. They are charging a fee for filling out the online form. I then wrote an email to the developer stating that I would not comply with the demand, as there was never any agreement. If he had told me on the phone that it would cost about €350, I probably would have hung up immediately. Today, I received a letter from a law firm. They are demanding that I pay the amount plus €70 in legal fees.
Has anyone had similar experiences and can tell me whether the construction company is entitled to the claim?
I am not a lawyer, but I believe that the construction company is obliged to provide proof as a prerequisite that the new building will meet the Kfw55 requirements.
Thank you in advance!
Cango30