Construction according to the Energy Saving Ordinance / GEG, assessment KfW55

  • Erstellt am 2021-11-01 13:09:03

Benutzer200

2021-11-03 10:18:33
  • #1
That's how I know it from my clients (for commercial properties). The buyer, for example of the logistics hall, gets a better property at the same price. However, they can also charge the tenant a higher net rent because the tenant has lower additional costs. Including the environment, everyone wins in the end. Open and fair.
 

Pacmansh

2022-03-04 09:59:52
  • #2
Good morning,
as it always is, everything takes longer than planned. The end of the story: We bought this beautiful little house in a great location. To prevent my questions posted here from going into the void, here is the outcome of how things turned out:

- The seller actually did not plan to build the house according to KfW55 standards with his construction company and energy consultant, but towards the end of the year he came up with the idea that it would be a good idea and adjusted the planning accordingly. Of course, he wants to pocket the subsidy himself, as suspected above.
- It is exactly as wrote above: "It is not done in secret." There is a corresponding clause in the purchase contract stating that the obligations to maintain the energy standard transfer to us.
- The application was then submitted just in time before the ominous weekend in January.
- For me, it doesn't bring much, except that I now get a house according to KfW55 and not according to the Energy Saving Ordinance/Building Energy Act. However, a photovoltaic system will also be installed on the roof, which was not part of the scope of services before. Ownership will probably be divided among the WEG (three parties in this case), but there are solutions for this as well.

Overall, I am now satisfied with the result. I would not have received my own subsidy due to the delay and the expiration of the program, and I had already thought about using the roof area for a photovoltaic system anyway. Now I don't have to pay for it myself and am still a (partial) owner.

Many thanks for the assessments, help, and tips here in the forum!
 

Similar topics
10.12.2009Subsidies for KFW55 and Sole/Water Heat Pump15
10.05.2012Heating costs per year KfW55 - KfW70, building decision heating11
02.09.2015KfW55 versus KfW7012
21.10.2015KfW funding after 01.04.201611
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
16.12.2015Is KfW55 worth it instead of KfW70 with an additional cost?16
13.03.2016How to move from KfW55 to KfW40+?23
02.02.2017Construction costs kfw70 vs. kfw55 vs. kfw4030
10.07.2016Is an energy consultant necessary for KfW55?21
18.08.2016KfW55 with 36 cm brick (im)possible?25
03.08.2016Structural engineer and KfW55 certification12
09.09.2017District heating KfW55 - KfW70 costs Ventilation system/Exhaust system37
18.12.2019Decision KfW55 vs. KfW40 plus22
30.12.2019Build a single-family house as KfW55 or Efficiency House 70?35
03.06.2020KfW 55 + BAFA Funding - Costs and Subsidies24
03.11.2020Single-family house with KfW55/controlled residential ventilation or Energy Saving Ordinance standard - experiences and opinions?22
30.11.2020Is estimating KFW55 useful, or is the Energy Saving Ordinance preferable?11
14.06.2022KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 4641239
07.01.2024KfW Funding Climate-Friendly Residential Building from March 2023152
07.03.2024New funding for family home ownership201

Oben