Bungalow with hipped roof – Is roof conversion sensible?

Before some municipal council meetings, drug tests should probably be conducted

I thought the same while reading. I've rarely heard something so stupid.

So kennen sie es eben im Rat. Schön nach Fraktionen sortiert.

Yeah, parcel 37 only for the Tuscany faction. This land consolidation is nicely intended, the development areas mixed like "Promenadenmischung" or "Colorado" with licorice and gummy bears are certainly an acquired taste. But you can also go too far with the interference in property rights; in my opinion, such a zoning plan can be challenged because of that. What’s next – on one side of the street only striped cats allowed, on the other only spotted ones?

Garden gnomes always have hats. It should actually be irrelevant whether they wear a middle part or a side part underneath.

The truth, or the royal road, lies in the middle. In a neighboring town of ours, the municipal council decided very liberally; in the land use plan GZ 0.3, semi-detached houses, bungalows, 1.5-story buildings, two-story buildings as city villas, and holiday apartments are permitted. The result is a development that is too dense for a village of 1,000 inhabitants; many plots now shade each other, they are stuck closely together, and the city villas only cause inconvenience to the neighborhood. In our place, city villas and holiday apartments were excluded, semi-detached houses only on some plots over 600 sqm, plus GZ 0.25. Only bungalows and 1.5-story buildings. Knee walls are prohibited. That certainly restricts more but allows everyone to have some sun in the garden. I find the holiday apartment ban very important. The changing rental to holiday guests destroys the neighborhood, causes increased traffic, and with large holiday homes, there are also recurring club bookings; the bowling club [Die Sechs Trinkfesten] parties hard for a week. I don’t want that in the residential area. Tourists should go to the hotel, not to the residential neighborhood. But, with the TE, it is what it is. And he can solve his problem. Karsten

That's how they know it in the council. Nicely sorted by factions. One area for the blacks, one for the reds, one for the greens, maybe another for the yellows. That's how life is supposed to be. Citizens should also please sort themselves. Karsten

I had to chuckle briefly. In my agent's sales plan, the "groups" are marked red, yellow, and blue



Thanks, I will definitely take a look at it!

I'm certainly quite glad already that it's not as hopeless as I first thought As long as the municipality doesn't have any other tricks up its sleeve...

Kniestock forbidden.

Another piece of nonsense from development plans. The eaves height requirement limits the building volume sufficiently. How far below the eaves an interior floor ceiling runs does not concern the observer (or the neighbor) at all.

Ok. The reds are the Toscanaville, socialists. The yellows the bungalows, the tax cutters, the blues the garden gnome houses, the AfD saves the Western world. Blacks and Greens build better elsewhere, their building land is either at the biotope or next to the Daimler dealership. Karsten