Bungalow with developed attic 135 m² (amateur) draft please evaluate

Floor area ratio: 0.4
Plot ratio: 0.8
(...)
Roof type: hip roof, up to 35 degrees and 80cm knee wall
Style: bungalow
Orientation: see picture
Maximum heights/limits: TH 6.5
further specifications: garage with gable roof

I can't quite put this together...
Just to clarify for myself: do you want a bungalow with max. 80cm knee wall or is that a requirement? Because then the plot ratio = 0.8 doesn't make sense to me. Or am I confused?

If the bungalow is your wish, then the following doesn't make sense to me:

I find bedrooms and bathrooms cozier in the attic and also because you don’t have to feel that someone could walk past the window at any time, purely a matter of feeling

So somehow: wash me, but don’t get me wet...

Please clarify what is the development plan and what is your wish:
Hip roof?
35°?
Knee wall?
Plot ratio = 0.8?

Especially if you want the bedroom in the upper floor, I would treat myself to a higher knee wall (if the development plan allows it).
If the bungalow is a requirement, are you even allowed to build out the upper floor?

The same goes for the hip roof: is that a requirement?
If not, you can better realize your space requirements with a gable roof or a staggered gable roof (and it will also be cheaper).

conservative or modern construction: rather conservative, coziness is the priority

You can build however you want, but I oppose the idea that an open construction style cannot also be cozy!!!
;-)

First of all, thanks for your comments :) I already expected that the attic floor would spark a discussion, but that’s what we’re here for. I’m already glad that the ground floor mostly fits, I was actually quite satisfied with that myself :)

If you want to convert an upper floor already, I would go back to a gable roof and enlarge the knee wall inside. Actually, you’d have to wall up to 2.30 m height at the top and seal off the rest behind it.

Alternatively, you could use an offset shed roof: one side raised with a comfortable living height, the other side, for example, open to the ground floor or as a low side wall.

Unfortunately, the development plan doesn’t allow that, otherwise I would prefer a gable roof too. But since I want to have the plot and, as I said, I also quite like dormer slopes in general because they feel cozy, I’ve actually come to terms with it and find it quite charming. Of course, it brings the disadvantages mentioned here...

Overlooked, right? As I understand it, the toilet should work. But the wardrobe is a problem, right? What also seems rather questionable to me is the landing staircase.

Sounds strange, but I wouldn’t need a wardrobe or at least not a big one, at least as long as there’s no lady in the house (then probably even more ;) ). I was thinking more along the lines of some kind of built-in dresser in the slope. Alternatively, maybe something similar to your suggestion, where you catch the upper side with a projecting wall, which loses a bit of space, but then you could place a wardrobe.
Basically, my plan was also just bedroom and bathroom upstairs at first, however I would still like to have an additional room that can be used as a children’s room if necessary (planned but not fixed with kids actually^^). If I include it downstairs as well, the overall floor area gets significantly bigger (ground floor + attic). That’s why it has moved upstairs in the end. So far I haven’t found a good solution for that, though.

What exactly do you mean regarding the landing staircase?

I can’t quite follow that... Just to clarify for me: do you want a bungalow with max. 80cm knee wall or is that a requirement? Because then the floor area ratio of 0.8 makes no sense to me. Or am I missing something?

I attached a screenshot of the change to the development plan. I hope that speaks for itself. The part where my plot falls is colored. Bungalow is not mentioned as a designation, but I assume that was meant. However, I can’t deduce from that why the attic shouldn’t be allowed to be converted, or? As mentioned, I basically wouldn’t mind a single story, but then the building envelope gets tight :(

You can build however you want, but I object to the idea that an open design can’t also be cozy!!! ;-)

I can’t generally disagree with you there, that wasn’t my intention ;)

So... I haven’t overlooked anything :)

Bed is unusable from one side.

Unfortunately, you are right. I was thinking in single mode and first only saw my 1.40 bed, where that is not a big problem, but still drew a big bed... in that case, you would actually have to climb over each other ^^ hm...

I have attached a screenshot of the zoning plan amendment. I hope it speaks for itself.

Unfortunately, it does not speak clearly: the table says "also" (therefore the old variant would be permissible in the entire area and alternatively the new one in 1.1): however, the text talks about not mixing (?).

Unfortunately, it does not speak clearly: the table says "also" (therefore the old version would be permissible in the entire area and alternatively the new one in 1.1): however, the text speaks of not mixing (?).

Before that, there was exclusively the WA1 specification for all properties, and through the change, certain subareas were changed to WA1.1 and WA1.2, so that now, looking at the entire area, you can of course choose between the three versions, but the property must also be located in the corresponding subarea. They basically divided the whole area into "quarters"... why, please don’t ask me ^^
And my property is located in the WA1.1 area. So if I want a gable roof, I have to look for another property, which I do not intend to do.

Sounds strange but I wouldn't need a wardrobe or if then not a big one, at least as long as there's no lady in the house (then probably all the more ;) ).

Once the house is there, the ladies will definitely line up. And then you need plenty of wardrobe space. ;)

What exactly do you mean regarding the landing staircase?

Looks a bit short to me, but that can be deceiving. A landing needs quite a bit of space. Do you already have an idea how high the ceiling should be and the floor height? A landing usually requires about 3m in depth.