Building Authority Problems - Purchased a Defective Plot

What could be (in terms of philosophical nutritional value) more beautiful than when the side discussion about the nonsense of a nonsense assumption also cascades? - and in such cases, the culture of revising an opinion, which I otherwise highly appreciate, borders almost on a (formally undoubtedly non-punishable) party pooper.

Was the new application successful?

In any case, it is not a defective property.

Since the burden of proof for a lawful construction of other structural installations lies solely with the builder, it might make sense to base the new heights on the last approved sections of the farm and refer to the existing protection for the site here.

could it make sense

Well, maybe at least for the readers following along. The OP was apparently last here five months ago:

Well, maybe at least for the readers. The OP was apparently here for the last time five months ago:

I interpret this as meaning that the problem was solved with your support. By "your" I mean, besides 11ant, also the forum.

I interpret this as meaning that the problem was solved with your support. By "your" I mean, besides 11ant, also the forum.

Addressing 11ant with "you" should just be proper, right? :p Just kidding :)