ruedigold
2014-10-16 14:16:42
- #1
Before my first post: first a friendly greeting to all the kind posters.
Until now, I was a convinced tenant... because of flexibility, and for financial and family reasons. Now this Mr. Draghi & his yes-men have turned the world upside down: money is the cheapest thing you can buy.
For a house building project, I can put my substantial rent into the balance and add some myself. With 40% equity properly financed on the principal, such a house of my own (well, 60% would still belong to the bank) would probably make economic sense. I lose my flexibility, but I don’t need it like I used to.
I understand as little about real estate as I do about cars. Both are necessary economic goods that cost a pretty penny and cause trouble. Nevertheless, both have their appeal. For the first time, I am seriously considering what it would mean if I got myself a house, i.e. had one built, since I cannot contribute any labor myself.
What bothers me are the risks of building/buying a house. Here, too, I draw the car analogy. With a car, I get 100% delivered as ordered. If there are defects, there are a few attempts at rectification, then the vehicle goes back to the seller. And how is it with a house? Consumer protection? Not to be found.
Still, given the circumstances, it seems worth a try. I’m making a plan now. First, I’m going to the model home estate in Frechen. And already there I have the uneasy feeling that I will be pretty much on my own with my questions and doubts.
Hence my very first strategic consideration, and hence this posting: I need advice. Someone who advises me solidly and based on their own many years of experience. Someone who knows the pitfalls over which a greenhorn stumbles. Architect? Why do I need an architect if the house is delivered by the prefab house manufacturer and placed as contractually agreed? What would the architect tell me?
Then I read that the contracts with the house manufacturers very often contain serious defects because services are not listed. Then trouble is preprogrammed. I want to avoid that at all costs proactively.
In the manufacturers’ brochures, I always see only houses. But what about the garages? Where do the 4 trash bins go? Where do my bikes have space? Where is my grill stored in winter and where in summer? My neighbors with a semi-detached house plus garage often have their three cars everywhere, only no car is in the garage. The garage is the missing storage room in the house. Was all that planned by the architect beforehand?
I understand so little about it that a building project still frightens me. How do people with experience see the picture I have drawn here? That would really interest me a lot, thank you.
Until now, I was a convinced tenant... because of flexibility, and for financial and family reasons. Now this Mr. Draghi & his yes-men have turned the world upside down: money is the cheapest thing you can buy.
For a house building project, I can put my substantial rent into the balance and add some myself. With 40% equity properly financed on the principal, such a house of my own (well, 60% would still belong to the bank) would probably make economic sense. I lose my flexibility, but I don’t need it like I used to.
I understand as little about real estate as I do about cars. Both are necessary economic goods that cost a pretty penny and cause trouble. Nevertheless, both have their appeal. For the first time, I am seriously considering what it would mean if I got myself a house, i.e. had one built, since I cannot contribute any labor myself.
What bothers me are the risks of building/buying a house. Here, too, I draw the car analogy. With a car, I get 100% delivered as ordered. If there are defects, there are a few attempts at rectification, then the vehicle goes back to the seller. And how is it with a house? Consumer protection? Not to be found.
Still, given the circumstances, it seems worth a try. I’m making a plan now. First, I’m going to the model home estate in Frechen. And already there I have the uneasy feeling that I will be pretty much on my own with my questions and doubts.
Hence my very first strategic consideration, and hence this posting: I need advice. Someone who advises me solidly and based on their own many years of experience. Someone who knows the pitfalls over which a greenhorn stumbles. Architect? Why do I need an architect if the house is delivered by the prefab house manufacturer and placed as contractually agreed? What would the architect tell me?
Then I read that the contracts with the house manufacturers very often contain serious defects because services are not listed. Then trouble is preprogrammed. I want to avoid that at all costs proactively.
In the manufacturers’ brochures, I always see only houses. But what about the garages? Where do the 4 trash bins go? Where do my bikes have space? Where is my grill stored in winter and where in summer? My neighbors with a semi-detached house plus garage often have their three cars everywhere, only no car is in the garage. The garage is the missing storage room in the house. Was all that planned by the architect beforehand?
I understand so little about it that a building project still frightens me. How do people with experience see the picture I have drawn here? That would really interest me a lot, thank you.