In your example, user behavior probably makes much more of a difference than the different types of stones.
In my opinion, a compelling argument that probably applies to every user. The now widely accepted mindset of high temperatures certainly increases consumption more than the choice of a particular material.
Of course, nobody should be cold, yet I often hear and read about almost indispensable assumptions regarding temperatures that cause more increases than could be prevented by construction.
I now live in a really well-insulated house (lower than Kfw40) and would never want it any other way, not only because of subsidies or possibly required standards. There are winter days when the heating doesn't run at all because the insulation keeps the heat inside.
Adding more insulation in some places and less in others makes no sense; there must be a consistent concept or the desire to insulate to the maximum. In my opinion, it also doesn't heat up as strongly in summer despite the south side as our old house (36 cm Poroton).
Certainly, this pays off, whether in resale value or heating costs, but it also currently provides a noticeable added value that would make it worth implementing for me.
So you should consider from the outset whether these circumstances are important to you and then consistently follow the path (floor slab, windows, wall insulation, roof insulation, etc.) or not; then the "normal" things your construction company does will be enough to get a house where you can live comfortably.
It has also become somewhat trendy to emphasize these values so much; what matters is the overall project.