Blower Door Test - Meaning of the Result

  • Erstellt am 2018-01-05 23:51:40

AndreasPlü

2018-01-05 23:51:40
  • #1
Hello,

today we had the airtightness test as the last trade in the already occupied house.

The result: N 50 = 0.68

We built solid Kfw 70 (2017). What does that mean? Is that good, okay, or rather so-so?

Is it to be expected that there are particularly harmful leaks? The tester found a slight leak at a sliding door but considered it within limits, which brings us back to the original question
 

Alex85

2018-01-06 06:43:46
  • #2
Depending on the source, different limit values can be found. The Energy Saving Ordinance states 3.0 and with a ventilation system 1.5. KFW states 1.5 in program 153 at funding level 40 Plus also with (mandatory) ventilation system, but recommends <0.6. A passive house should also be <0.6 according to PHPP. I do not know regularly usual measured values for comparable new buildings. In this case, I would trust the person measuring that your value is okay. Is the sliding lift door leaky at the connection? Otherwise, this could still be mentioned to the supplier. Besides, sliding lift doors are simply inherently not perfect when it comes to tightness (also in regard to water).
 

Müllerin

2018-01-06 09:26:08
  • #3
0.6 is the minimum requirement for passive houses - so your value is really good.
 

Knallkörper

2018-01-06 10:35:59
  • #4
We had 2.5 in the first measurement. There were two unsealed openings: 180 mm chimney draft, 180 mm exhaust air in the kitchen. So 3.0 would really be shoddy work if that is the final state after the Energy Saving Ordinance.

I would assess leaks depending on their location. A leaky door to the cold attic is "deadly." Poor vapor barriers that can lead to condensation in the insulation layer I would tear out. A leaky terrace door, on the other hand, would almost be acceptable to me.
 

blackm88

2018-01-06 11:18:59
  • #5
We had a value of 0.511
 

Alex85

2018-01-06 11:35:27
  • #6


Yeah, I think so too. But it really is like that, you can check it yourself. In general, the Energy Saving Ordinance and the EEWärmG are by far not as bad as their reputation suggests. There are numerous exceptions, substitute measures, generally "many roads lead to Rome". You can also apply for exemptions if the economic feasibility is not given, etc.
 

Similar topics
19.06.2009Evaluation of the KfW 60 House Contract: Credit Check for House12
12.05.2014KfW 70 without ventilation system107
21.08.2011Which heating system is suitable for our Kfw 70 house without a basement?15
07.10.2016Which heating is recommended for KfW 55?58
01.05.2015Building without a ventilation system using hollow bricks?35
07.06.2013Is it mandatory to build according to the Energy Saving Ordinance (2009)?12
07.04.2016New KfW conditions from 04/201674
19.06.2015Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 201442
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
30.03.20162016 KfW Efficiency House 55 according to reference values (U-values)39
23.10.2015Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 - Gas boiler without solar?38
16.03.2016Chimney no longer allowed from 01.04.16 in KFW 55?19
11.02.2017KfW loan in 2017 for a house under the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance17
23.02.2017New construction according to the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance no longer possible without a ventilation/exhaust system?40
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
18.04.2021KfW 55 - Ventilation system yes/no? - Experiences222
29.01.2021Is the 2014 Energy Saving Ordinance a KfW standard?24
09.09.2021KFW 55 EE Funding - New Construction Brick Thickness/Ventilation System?25

Oben