You do read online, however, as a counterpoint, that the surface is not always as even as you would need it for a flooring. Then it is sanded down or leveled, but nobody calculates that in advance. Whether that is true, I do not know. With such statements online you always have to be cautious. There are usually very positive as well as negative statements about building materials (depending on the author and their motivation).
I don’t have any concrete offers now, but according to my research the cost difference between conventional and thermally activated concrete floor slabs is not very large.
Well okay, but what is this about anyway? Functionally, the Swedish slab in my opinion has no real advantage, so it’s about the price.
a difference of €200 to €1,000
I haven’t checked the numbers to see if that adds up. But I consider the difference significant. We are calculating about €110 per sqm for the slab, including the necessary insulation (KFW 55). That means, for example, an 11x11 sqm "city villa" €13,310. Your €800 price difference corresponds to 6% additional cost. If you keep that attitude of "it doesn’t cost anything," you can calculate for your whole project what that means in money.
No sources, just plain engineering common sense.
That is probably one of the most impressive remote diagnoses I have ever read here. Where do you buy your crystal balls?
The structural engineer will calculate that.