Osnabruecker
2021-06-21 16:01:56
- #1
I certainly did not mean only the site plan.
That can only be supported. The window in the kitchen opens into the darkened passage?
Avoid building obligations by alternative placement of the construction project?
- Erstellt am 2021-06-21 12:57:23
That can only be supported. The window in the kitchen opens into the darkened passage?
JayBee_1985
2021-06-21 16:03:18
- #2
According to his statement, there is nothing against a construction easement. Subject to the neighbors, who must of course agree. It is very interesting here and I should have registered much earlier instead of putting complete trust in the hands of the builder.Unfortunately, I have to disappoint you again right away, because - subject to knowledge of the complete development plan - your attachment in #9 shows a building envelope with boundary distances on all sides. Without an additional exemption from the development plan, I therefore see no chance of exceeding the 9m limit. By the way, not even with the distance area construction easement, since §23, paragraph 5 of the Land Use Ordinance only permits constructions without distance areas outside the buildable area. If your building permit authority offers builder consultation, I recommend presenting your plans. Some authorities are quite flexible, some are only programmed for resistance. How does your planner intend to fulfill your wishes?
JayBee_1985
2021-06-21 16:04:22
- #3
It has been removed... otherwise it makes little sense to us.That can only be supported. Does the window in the kitchen face the darkened passage?
11ant
2021-06-21 16:23:26
- #4
It is apparently "doesn't matter at first" how the auxiliary system is sketched.
Such assessments are suitable to support my suspicion of incompetence against the planner ;-)
That is definitely not our intention!
Then I am curious which small slices of salami you will add next.
Edit: A Caddy is at least 4.40m long.
Here it seems to me that the Citroën version of a Fiat 500 is drawn in.
Escroda
2021-06-21 16:31:58
- #5
With a bit of goodwill from the building authority, I wouldn't rule that out. But a rejection wouldn't surprise me. And what speaks against bilateral boundary construction?According to his statement, nothing speaks against a building obligation.
JayBee_1985
2021-06-21 18:31:27
- #6
Thank you very much for the spontaneous draft.
We had the same consideration, but at the time we wanted to put "überdacht" on the table, although back then we did not yet know that it would turn out to be so complicated up to now.
We had the same consideration, but at the time we wanted to put "überdacht" on the table, although back then we did not yet know that it would turn out to be so complicated up to now.