Architect misjudges clinker facade area

As written, "one should not do that."

As written, "one should not do that".

...with a GC.

Something like also occurs with individual trade contracts. With individual trades, you can clearly act differently than with a general contractor, but the bigger the change is supposed to be, the more problems it causes or at least effort. It's just like that.

Exactly. Anyone who wants to keep their costs under control should plan carefully beforehand and then strictly follow that plan. Any change is a source of errors and a reason for a price increase. K.

...with a general contractor.

No, always. Surely, it often still works with a simple single-family house, but problems are preprogrammed. There have already been numerous threads in this forum proving this. A bigger project where two or three companies thought it could be done so highlife is, for example, the BER.

I would be interested to know whether the critics built with a general contractor or with individual trades.

I don't understand where the problem is from your perspective.

If things are changed during the shell construction, the subsequent trades don't care at all, since they are not working in parallel with the shell constructor.

If the windows are changed, the electrician or tiler doesn't care.

Of course, there are times when certain things interlock.

But whoever is present with individual trade contracts can have an influence.