Alternative facade in clinker look

Slips are a suitable and appropriate solution both for modernizations and for such new construction projects

Maybe it's just me, but whether slipped bricks or full clinker bricks, you can see it immediately and it always somehow looks "cheap".

? How is one supposed to tell from the outside how deep the stone is? Assuming, of course, it is one with reasonable cornerstones, where there is no vertical joint at every house corner revealing the structure, that always looks bad.

And it is done almost without exception the same way, the same with falls and reveals, where it is quickly completely omitted. In our new development areas there are already a few fully faced with bricks and (especially when only the ground floor is supposed to look faced with bricks) then with brick slips, the latter always looked like sh** to me...

You can already pay attention to this in advance and take these points into consideration

whether slips or full bricks can be seen immediately and always somehow looks "cheap"

Even if you saw it immediately: slips are not uncommon when more was inherited than was needed for the bathroom renovation. Slips in new construction were rarer in the past, but that is a matter of taste of the time and does not hinder their suitability for that. What appears "decisive" to me is that the OP with

Now we would like a clinkerlook

has clearly expressed where his main motive for this wall surface lies. And for that, overturning the construction would simply be inappropriate.

But that rather says "if it's done badly, it looks stupid" than making any statement about brick slips or clinker. Which, on closer inspection, is quite a meaningless statement. I could also post photos of awful clinker facades…