GU suggests a decentralized ventilation system.
In my opinion, I think a central one would be better.
Yes,
If no ventilation was planned at the beginning and now the choice is between central and decentralized, here is my opinion on the question:
A good central ventilation system has a few features that a decentralized one does not have to the same extent. (Heat recovery in winter; pleasant humidity in winter thanks to an enthalpy exchanger. At the same time, some ventilation systems offer good programmability to automatically counteract heat in summer.)
Therefore, if the budget allows, I would plan with a central ventilation system.
I see it the same way. The key regarding the budget will lie here, which is why the GU suggests this variant: namely fear that the customer will find the offer too expensive and might possibly turn to a competitor.
However, I noticed that I presented it a bit incorrectly. For that, I apologize once again from the heart.
That is long forgiven. And my "translation" shows that it was certainly understood. After all, it is no rarity that a newbie enters the room and speaks in a layman’s way. Therefore, we are already familiar with Risalite being called bay windows or Zwerchhäuser being referred to as dormers. Or that someone leaves out the quotation marks at the fake "site manager."
I am somewhat surprised that you write this to me.
Until now, I have not even found anything where it was written that a central ventilation system is cheaper than a decentralized ventilation system.
The decentralized variant is only noticeably more expensive if you think along and can calculate; it is apparently offered as “cheaper” than the central one. Or also due to reasons of (in)competence (as with the provider Kern-Haus). With a central controlled residential ventilation system, even a layperson notices if the entire house is not supplied with it. However, if you install inefficient small units scattered in part of the house and "decentralized" (which in this sense is synonymous with "not networked"), the offer may easily appear as a cheaper variant. If you correct the calculation trick and supply the entire house with small units, the disadvantage of non-networking (= lack of exchange / capacity pooling) remains, but the apparent cost advantage in terms of purchase price reverses (half a dozen times twenty percent is more than index 100). The operating effort adds to the inefficiency (due to the missing connection to a system) and the reduced performance (missing heat recovery and the like). Therefore, the decentralized version is rather suitable as a retrofit if you want to install a controlled residential ventilation system in an existing building and are content with ventilation comfort and better sleeping air.