a canopy like no other I have seen before

I find it grotesque to talk about "truth" in connection with optical perception. Everyone probably perceives something different as the truth

Please read more carefully. What was meant was exactly the personal opinion or truth of each individual who wanted to impose a speaking ban on kati1337.

I definitely did not want to impose a ban on speaking, I'm sorry if you understood it that way. I simply don't consider it a good achievement of humanity that negative opinions about visually "different" things are sometimes communicated in a hurtful manner. That is not helpful to anyone. At most, it makes someone sad; otherwise, it benefits no one to deny the object the term "art." After all, a core idea of some art forms is to create new things, to challenge, and to cross boundaries.

If someone feels the urge to express themselves negatively, for whatever reason, I still find an "it's not really my thing" clearly fairer than the more generalized statements that have sometimes been made here.

maybe still too embarrassing with his construction of an evolutionary development of building technology

It was important to me to make it clear that the argument: "The canopy does not fit the house because it has a different style" is not only seen this way by me but also elsewhere. I do not consider this an argument because you can see with open eyes that very often in the world opposites connect, like for example "The lotus from the mud."
And: yes, I appreciate the reference to the possible function of mutations :) Thank you. I consider it "true." (I would even claim: "That is the truth" ;))

"If he is happy with it and can cope with the resonance, we don't have to care."

It can be "none of your" concern :cool: