Tego12
2018-12-07 10:22:22
- #1
Unfortunately, nobody really thought ahead there...
It is optimal to have the same pressure loss in all heating circuits so that no throttling is needed anywhere (of course, the heat load of the individual rooms must have been properly calculated in advance) and thus the maximum lowest flow temperature is achieved.
The problem here: circuits of similar length, yes... but the pressure loss of a circuit with a 5 cm pipe spacing is significantly higher than one with a 20 cm pipe spacing... this directly results in hydraulic balancing that, to achieve sufficient flow in the bathroom, all other circuits must be throttled down.. which in turn means that the flow temperature has to be senselessly raised -> loss of efficiency and higher heating costs.
Aside from that, it has already been mentioned... 20 cm pipe spacing is actually no longer used nowadays because it costs efficiency due to the higher required flow temperature. 5 cm in the bathroom is also pointless because the heat output compared to 7.5 cm is hardly better with higher pressure loss. Better to increase the surface area (for example through wall heating), the effect is much greater.
As has been said many times: contact the contractual partner, they should at least properly adjust the poor planning. This will come at the expense of a higher flow temperature and possibly the lifespan of the heat generator (more frequent cycling due to suboptimal hydraulics), but at least it will be warm everywhere.
It is optimal to have the same pressure loss in all heating circuits so that no throttling is needed anywhere (of course, the heat load of the individual rooms must have been properly calculated in advance) and thus the maximum lowest flow temperature is achieved.
The problem here: circuits of similar length, yes... but the pressure loss of a circuit with a 5 cm pipe spacing is significantly higher than one with a 20 cm pipe spacing... this directly results in hydraulic balancing that, to achieve sufficient flow in the bathroom, all other circuits must be throttled down.. which in turn means that the flow temperature has to be senselessly raised -> loss of efficiency and higher heating costs.
Aside from that, it has already been mentioned... 20 cm pipe spacing is actually no longer used nowadays because it costs efficiency due to the higher required flow temperature. 5 cm in the bathroom is also pointless because the heat output compared to 7.5 cm is hardly better with higher pressure loss. Better to increase the surface area (for example through wall heating), the effect is much greater.
As has been said many times: contact the contractual partner, they should at least properly adjust the poor planning. This will come at the expense of a higher flow temperature and possibly the lifespan of the heat generator (more frequent cycling due to suboptimal hydraulics), but at least it will be warm everywhere.