Wrong concrete in the foundation? XC3 instead of XC2

  • Erstellt am 2016-09-08 22:19:46

partyarti

2016-09-08 22:19:46
  • #1
Hello everyone,

with us, the foundation (reinforced) was poured with a concrete C 20/25 XC3.

Now I have learned, however, that normally an XC2 is used for foundations.
According to the standard, XC3 is used in air environment and only moderate moisture?

Is XC3 now wrong? Does it have any consequences that could occur over the years?

Regards
Arthur
 

Jochen104

2016-09-09 06:23:41
  • #2
What do the expert, executing company, concrete plant, and GÜ or architect think about this?
 

KlaRa

2016-09-09 16:24:37
  • #3
Hello "partyarti". The concrete exposure class designation XC2 is required when corrosion of the reinforcing steel due to carbonation of the cement paste is to be feared. Depending on the environmental conditions to which concrete is exposed, a distinction is made between classes XC1 to XC4. The latter class is used under the "most severe moisture conditions". However, in your building, we are not talking about an industrial hall, but possibly a residential building. This means that the floor slab is covered, moisture can only come from below - and then must be sealed from the rear if the earth-contacting rooms in the basement are not intended for secondary purposes only. Evaluating this is the planner's responsibility. But ultimately, there will be no CO2 accumulations under the floor slab that would make the initially mentioned exposure class necessary at all. In an exposed production or storage hall, this could be decisive. In a residential building, however, not! --------------------------------------------------------- Regards: KlaRa
 

Payday

2016-09-09 17:12:53
  • #4
what does the construction service description say? if it says xc2 there, the discussion is over. otherwise, either listen to klara or have an expert take a look at the matter.
 

partyarti

2016-09-15 11:39:46
  • #5
Hello everyone,

first of all, thanks for your answers.
I had many phone calls the following day:
Statement from concrete plants (where the concrete was ordered): XC3 is higher quality than XC2, so there should be no worries. The plant no longer produces C20/25 XC2 as a standard, only from XC3.

Statement from another concrete plant: same as the statement above.

Statement from the architect: no problem, XC3 is better

Statement from the structural engineer: see the architect's statement

Best regards

Arti
 

Similar topics
19.07.2018Draw the plan yourself? Do you necessarily need an architect?11
18.02.2011Architect totally messed up - experiences?17
30.09.2012Final invoice architect13
27.10.2013Architect --> Agreements? What is that?21
16.04.2014Cost of soil survey - Does the architect pay or do we?12
16.09.2014Termination of collaboration with architect - demands excessive fee28
01.10.2014Collaboration with an architect - how does it work properly?22
25.02.2015Planning / Architect, involvement of specialist planners for the approval plan10
10.04.2015Cost estimate architect single-family house. Your assessment44
26.04.2015Semi-detached house architect or general contractor / prefabricated house or solid construction13
27.12.2015Who has built with an architect? Experiences??85
11.09.2015Building a garage on the boundary is not possible according to the architect.11
17.11.2015Is an architect really that expensive?46
20.08.2016Base slab vs strip foundation15
05.04.2018Water on ground slab, cause and leak unknown24
24.08.2018Assessment of the offer price for insulation under the floor slab17
07.11.2018Cutting the floor slab due to incorrectly placed drainage pipes20
17.04.2024The wall is not level on the base plate or protrudes by 2 cm26
28.04.2024Screw foundation as a cost-effective alternative to a slab?24
27.12.2021Base plate pedestal height measurement17

Oben