What will the building authority say?

Info: Terraces belong to the building, therefore floor space ratio l

It seems the Hells Angels had a fling with the head of the building authority and thus were just barely able to prevent the development of their "industrial area in the open"

sounds like a "barbecue evening"!

Info: Terraces belong to the building, therefore floor area ratio l

Correct. According to the 1990 Land Use Ordinance § 19 but not the 1977 Land Use Ordinance

Submit the plan for approval and report ... as a neighbor, I would definitely take a very close look at it.

You can actually make out a few things on this plan, although the measurements are set like the wild west



I say this, the bathrooms (especially the one on the left side of the plan) are very poorly designed, mini showers, bad passage situation to the washbasin.

Regarding the bedrooms, I doubt that a 60 cm deep closet (the plan measurement should be 70 cm there) fits behind the doors.

In the attic

the utility room seems to be planned in the south. Dining/Cooking/Living, if I imagine a table there, then access to the square terrace area is pretty much impossible. And you can’t say anything about the rest because simply no measurements are visible.

But this is rather a case for @Escroda

I didn't check the calculations individually, the authority has to verify that, but the approaches are basically correct, although somewhat confusing since a floor space index II appears, which does not exist according to the 1968 Land Use Ordinance.

and that's exactly what development plans are for, so that personal rights are not violated.

No, that's what neighbor law is for and it says 2.50 m distance, which is maintained by the balconies here but not by the terraces. And building regulations: Unfortunately, there is no site plan with the distance areas and boundary distances. Whether the balconies comply with the permitted third of the boundary distance underrun is therefore not apparent but may be doubted.

but here the floor space index II does not play a role

Correct and therefore it should not appear under 7. in your calculation form either.

but not in the 1977 Land Use Ordinance

... and not in the 1968 Land Use Ordinance either, which according to your information is to be applied.

Good day
the >Baugenehmigung< has been granted for the mentioned Bv!

Best regards