Mizit
2017-04-09 14:17:35
- #1
The topic of windows continues to concern us.
Existing windows are 22 years old, double-glazed, with no burglary-resistant measures. The house has quite a lot of windows, so retrofitting for security would be correspondingly expensive.
That is why we are now very unsure whether, also in terms of heat loss, insulation... installing new windows might possibly be more cost-effective in terms of cost/benefit, upgrading the house, etc.
All the windows have a U-value of 1.3. This refers to the value relating to the entire window area.
We know there are windows with a value of 0.6. Can it be calculated that this would mean roughly only half the heat loss? We have 2 children, so we also heat the bathroom, children’s rooms accordingly... The house has many windows, and costs for retrofitting locks would be incurred anyway.
Or are new windows that approach passive house values so expensive that it wouldn’t pay off in the next 20 years anyway? Is this energy-saving thing overrated?
It is about 20 window sashes in total... 3 of them are floor-to-ceiling windows. For at least 11 sashes we would retrofit mushroom locks, and we were given an offer amounting to costs per window of just under 300 euros... So the retrofitting would cost around 3500 euros, but the windows would remain 22 years old, i.e., double-glazed with a U-value of 1.3.
Existing windows are 22 years old, double-glazed, with no burglary-resistant measures. The house has quite a lot of windows, so retrofitting for security would be correspondingly expensive.
That is why we are now very unsure whether, also in terms of heat loss, insulation... installing new windows might possibly be more cost-effective in terms of cost/benefit, upgrading the house, etc.
All the windows have a U-value of 1.3. This refers to the value relating to the entire window area.
We know there are windows with a value of 0.6. Can it be calculated that this would mean roughly only half the heat loss? We have 2 children, so we also heat the bathroom, children’s rooms accordingly... The house has many windows, and costs for retrofitting locks would be incurred anyway.
Or are new windows that approach passive house values so expensive that it wouldn’t pay off in the next 20 years anyway? Is this energy-saving thing overrated?
It is about 20 window sashes in total... 3 of them are floor-to-ceiling windows. For at least 11 sashes we would retrofit mushroom locks, and we were given an offer amounting to costs per window of just under 300 euros... So the retrofitting would cost around 3500 euros, but the windows would remain 22 years old, i.e., double-glazed with a U-value of 1.3.