Standby shutdown - sense or nonsense?

  • Erstellt am 2016-10-05 13:25:24

Grym

2016-10-06 10:09:14
  • #1
If the standby mode is deactivated for only 2/3 of the time, the savings naturally reduce to 7.30 euros for our exemplary 5 devices.

If I spend 100 euros just for the switch and 30 euros in interest, it will pay off after 18 years. Great. The main thing is that the interest rates don't rise at the follow-up financing and that the device NEVER breaks down.

Conclusion: Not financially worthwhile. As a technical gimmick, if you like, you can do it. Category [Solarakku].
 

Mycraft

2016-10-06 10:38:06
  • #2
As so often, it depends on the individual case. If that is the case for you, then that's great... then you can leave everything as it is.

For me, disabling per socket only cost about 20 euros, so the thing pays off after just a few years.

And if you simply use a power strip like many here in the forum, then the money spent on it is recouped in a short time.

As you can see, there isn't just one case where it is worthwhile and also not one where it is not worthwhile at all...
 

Jochen104

2016-10-06 12:01:33
  • #3
You should rather think about whether you even need all those devices.

In our living room, the "multimedia equipment" consists only of a TV with an integrated receiver, to which a hard drive is connected, and a Blu-ray player. The player is only plugged in when I need it.
When I put the TV on standby, the hard drive also turns off, unless a recording is running.

I simply don't have PlayStations, Wiis, X-Boxes, amplifiers, and whatever else you (supposedly) need. That's why these devices don't consume any power for me :)
 

daniels87

2016-10-06 12:33:46
  • #4
Sometimes a simple master-slave power strip is enough. :)
 

Alex85

2016-10-06 12:38:03
  • #5
The basic idea is certainly understandable. However, the effort is not in any reasonable relation. Even the €30 power strip takes years (certainly not months, unless the devices are all from the last millennium) to pay off. So far, we have calculated the best case, i.e., saving standby power if the device is in standby mode all year round. Of course, times of active use and times when the plug was not pulled out are deducted from this.

But we will just go around in circles again. It is like the all-off switch at the front door in the KNX discussion. In my opinion, an absolute gimmick without a business case, but everyone should be happy in their own way.
 

daniels87

2016-10-06 12:54:16
  • #6
It is also about the fact that you do not have to turn off all devices. The large amplifier, for example, does not go into standby mode by itself.
 

Similar topics
17.08.2013Financing offer - Interest okay? Your opinion...10
08.04.2015Offer of financial consulting - Is the interest rate okay?15
18.04.2015Is a building savings contract still worthwhile with the current interest rates?10
28.06.2015Building a house - building savings contract with bad interest rates23
28.05.2016Annuity loan - Offered interest rates / Key points?17
22.06.2016Is a TA loan sensible? Interest and loan offer are okay13
27.03.2017Forward loan - Secure interest rates now?53
24.02.2017Living room 5m seating distance to television24
14.05.2017Mount the television on the wall30
12.12.2017What is the minimum distance between a fireplace and a television?11
25.10.2018How do you take the interest into account from the purchase of the land until moving in?59
20.11.2019Photovoltaic system that covers its monthly costs by itself and amortizes41
16.01.2021Speakers and television in the bathroom15
12.09.2021Purchase financing: how much equity (with the low interest rates)?27
11.07.2022House construction still realistic despite rising interest rates / construction costs?54
29.09.2022High interest rates with fixed interest, alternative flex loans?54
22.03.2024Home purchase financing despite high interest rates?24

Oben