Split-level floor plan on a slope with 140 sqm

Hi
I would also restart with the base once again.
But the toilet in the living room is absolutely out of the question.

Olli

Should level 1 have a basement? - the one-part representation of the airspace is nonsense, it is actually divided into four parts. The parapet height 257 is probably meant to indicate that the skylights only "start" above the normal room height, i.e. they have a particularly unfavorable ratio of light and view to plastering effort :-(

have now reconsidered the ideas of matte1987,

This is, given the result, an insulting inheritance squabble – which of the well-resolved details there do you believe have been recognizably incorporated here?

Should level 1 have a basement? – the single-part depicted airspace is nonsense, it is actually divided into four parts.

Level 1 does not have a basement

Budget including earthworks, outdoor facilities, incidental construction costs
Will not be enough on a slope

Budget is intended only for the house, without incidental construction costs.

The ears at the front in the hallway are not understandable, they ruin the rooms and otherwise have no added value, unless you put the doors differently and use a niche for a wardrobe.

Ok, they can also be left straight… the ears…

The toilet in the living room is absolutely out of the question.

That’s why I also mentioned it in my original post under “what I don’t like.”

Since you find very little about split level through the search function and this type of construction is otherwise only touched upon superficially on the internet, I thought I’d ask here in the group.

find it awful and out of the question.

doesn’t really help me much either.

would urgently involve the appropriate specialists.

I will definitely do so when it moves into the next phase.

Actually wanted to get help, tips and information here in advance as a newbie in housebuilding. Where I have already learned a lot of interesting things using the search function.

Given the result, this is an insulting skullduggery – which well-solved details there do you believe should have been clearly incorporated here?

The only insulting thing here is this saying, a pity.

The only offensive thing is this saying here, what a pity.

The only pity is this evasive answer – the secret of what was supposedly incorporated into the (built there and extensively admired in the house pictures thread) demonstrably successful design of the house by would really have interested me. And even if you don’t recognize it yourself in 3D: whatever it was, it must have remained only an intention; it didn’t come across – on the rear wagon part, he only finds head and rope.