Fridger
2021-01-18 17:20:34
- #1
Hello everyone,
we have already read several threads and posts in recent weeks and would now like to present our draft here in the forum for discussion - with the hope of receiving important feedback on what might not fit so well in one or the other part.
We look forward to your comments.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size 729 sqm
Slope yes max. 4 m rising from the street to the garden plot boundary
Site coverage ratio 0.3
Floor area ratio 0.6
Building window, building line and boundary present
Edge development no specification
Number of parking spaces 2
Number of floors 2
Roof type gable, hip, half-hipped roof, shed roof
Style no specification
Orientation no specification
Maximum heights/limits eaves height 5.5m; ridge height 10 m
Roof pitch: 35-45°
Client requirements
Style, roof type, building type: classic gable roof house with third gable and garage
Basement, floors: 2 floors without basement
Number of people, age: M30, F27, C1
Space requirement on the ground floor, upper floor: about 80 sqm each
Office: home office
Overnight guests per year: <10
Open or closed architecture: closed architecture
Conservative or modern construction: mixed
Open kitchen, cooking island: kitchen separable by double sliding door, cooking island desired
Number of dining seats: 8
Fireplace: possibly retrofitted
Garage included in planning
Office can also serve as a third child's room
Master bedroom in the third gable
House design
Who designed it:
Architect of the general contractor
What do you particularly like?
-Requirements regarding the plot basically implemented
What do you not like?
-Kitchen with cooking island currently not feasible (house shape would have to be more rectangular)
-Housekeeping/technical room not ideally located for connection to public infrastructure
-Children's room "too big" (would automatically be smaller with a more rectangular shape)
-Entrance area solution (dirt zone)
Preferred heating technology: probably ring trench collector
If you had to do without, which details/extras
-Can do without: living room can be smaller, staircase can be different
Why did the draft turn out the way it is now? e.g.
Draft was implemented based on our ideas and drawings.
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Site plan is not yet available in the current version, only serves here for illustration.
we have already read several threads and posts in recent weeks and would now like to present our draft here in the forum for discussion - with the hope of receiving important feedback on what might not fit so well in one or the other part.
We look forward to your comments.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size 729 sqm
Slope yes max. 4 m rising from the street to the garden plot boundary
Site coverage ratio 0.3
Floor area ratio 0.6
Building window, building line and boundary present
Edge development no specification
Number of parking spaces 2
Number of floors 2
Roof type gable, hip, half-hipped roof, shed roof
Style no specification
Orientation no specification
Maximum heights/limits eaves height 5.5m; ridge height 10 m
Roof pitch: 35-45°
Client requirements
Style, roof type, building type: classic gable roof house with third gable and garage
Basement, floors: 2 floors without basement
Number of people, age: M30, F27, C1
Space requirement on the ground floor, upper floor: about 80 sqm each
Office: home office
Overnight guests per year: <10
Open or closed architecture: closed architecture
Conservative or modern construction: mixed
Open kitchen, cooking island: kitchen separable by double sliding door, cooking island desired
Number of dining seats: 8
Fireplace: possibly retrofitted
Garage included in planning
Office can also serve as a third child's room
Master bedroom in the third gable
House design
Who designed it:
Architect of the general contractor
What do you particularly like?
-Requirements regarding the plot basically implemented
What do you not like?
-Kitchen with cooking island currently not feasible (house shape would have to be more rectangular)
-Housekeeping/technical room not ideally located for connection to public infrastructure
-Children's room "too big" (would automatically be smaller with a more rectangular shape)
-Entrance area solution (dirt zone)
Preferred heating technology: probably ring trench collector
If you had to do without, which details/extras
-Can do without: living room can be smaller, staircase can be different
Why did the draft turn out the way it is now? e.g.
Draft was implemented based on our ideas and drawings.
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Site plan is not yet available in the current version, only serves here for illustration.