Those were exactly our wishes that we directed to him.If you have communicated your wishes to him with it as well, his draft should actually fit significantly better. Here, however, one has the feeling that he modified an old draft.
Then clarify why he understood so little of it. After that, give him one more chance, and then decide whether to change the architect.Those were exactly our wishes that we addressed to him.
I don't find the approach that completely wrong. Basically, only a separate wardrobe was missing, and he doesn't like the dressing room that way. Maybe the former was forgotten to be communicated? He certainly couldn't have guessed the latter. Here is the last draft as an urban villa, although it pains me a bit. The children's room size is a little smaller than in the original. But I still find over 19m² quite ample. A fireplace and partition wall between the kitchen and living area could also be solved more openly. I would leave that thing out. The houses are now insulated in such a way that you don't feel the need for more warmth in winter. An electric imitation would probably suffice.Then clarify why he understood so little of it.
Viewed absolutely, you don't have to criticize the draft. Nevertheless, you don't go to the architect to have them pull a "house of other people" out of the drawer and erase a bit in it. From the "real architect," one rightfully expects, in my opinion, that they "cook fresh" for their fee.I don't find the approach that terribly wrong at all.
The thanks are rather avoided dry construction-encased downpipes in some corners where they are nicely ugly.
Visually, I still believe that – but acoustically ...We have the downpipe in the living room and thus such boxes and have framed the TV with it and put LED strips on the sides. No one has ever thought that there are pipes behind it.