Hello,
... and a lady from the building authority called saying that the garages between the houses are not allowed after all =(.
Is there a specific regulation for semi-detached houses that applies everywhere?
That is – admittedly somewhat late and annoying for you – on the other hand, anything else would have surprised me.
***Semi-detached house half
The definition of a semi-detached house is regulated in Germany in the Land Use Ordinance (§ 22 Land Use Ordinance). Among other things, it clearly distinguishes between the house types of semi-detached houses and multi-family houses. A semi-detached house is defined as a connected residential unit with both separate entrances and separate staircases, which is not the case with multi-family houses.
The exterior façade of a semi-detached house is usually designed symmetrically for urban planning reasons, which also applies equally to the floor plan of this house type. Building law furthermore requires the installation of a fire protection wall between the adjoining houses to prevent the spread of flames in the event of a fire.
A semi-detached house can either consist of two houses built on the property boundary or a unit built on the same plot. Semi-detached house developments have a significantly lower land consumption compared to conventional residential developments, which is why this house type is becoming increasingly popular.
Division
This is no different than with a condominium. There is a shared roof and the ownership is divided similarly to the declaration of division of condominiums. Changes to the façades can only be made afterwards if all owners of the semi-detached house carry out the changes and the majority agrees. Building permits must be observed in this context.
Sound transmission
Soundproofing regulations are often overlooked when it comes to marketing semi-detached houses profitably. This is similar to condominiums. Unscrupulous construction companies try to save construction costs on the separating walls. This starts with the planning of the foundations and the floor slabs. Sound travels better through solid building materials than through water.
This means that in semi-detached houses, if the floor slab and the foundations are not separated, sound is transmitted to the neighboring building. The sound in question is the kind transmitted, for example, by hammer drilling through building materials such as walls.
The developer’s argument that a building would settle differently if the foundations or the floor slab were separated cannot be accepted. This is undisturbed ground, as planners say, as long as it is not an excavation filled with debris and now used for a semi-detached house.
**Source: my website
***
§ 22 Land Use Ordinance Construction Method
(1) The type of construction can be specified as open or closed construction in the development plan.
(2) In open construction, buildings are erected as single houses, semi-detached houses, or groups of houses with side boundary distances. The length of the house types designated in sentence 1 must not exceed 50 m. Areas can be designated in the development plan where only single houses, only semi-detached houses, only groups of houses, or only two of these types of houses are permitted.
(3) In closed construction, buildings are erected without side boundary distances unless the existing development requires a deviation.
(4) A construction method deviating from paragraph 1 can be stipulated in the development plan. It can also be specified to what extent front, rear, and side property boundaries may or must be built up to.
***Source: dejure
Or can the building authority do whatever it wants?
Basically yes, as every building authority has the right to modify or suspend parts of the applicable state building code according to its own needs.
What you submitted with the building application is – between us pastors’ daughters – not a semi-detached house, but two detached single-family houses; you admit this yourself as your desired goal. Why your developer promotes this and why the municipality approved it – that is the question of all questions. Also, what happens now with the building permit and the resulting costs.
I can only urgently advise you to seek a conversation with the clerk who called and see how to "get the cow off the ice" so that all parties can continue to speak to each other civilly. As a tip: stubbornly sticking to positions, citing external examples, etc. can only end badly. I am sure the responsible building authority is also embarrassed that a permit was granted where it should not have been granted. So seek a factual discussion
Rhenish greetings