Room height after modernization still 220 cm

  • Erstellt am 2018-11-26 14:24:18

Horst0976

2018-11-26 14:24:18
  • #1
Hello everyone,

I am planning to buy a house and would like your advice.

The house was built in 1957 and was completely modernized in 2012.

Among other things, the basement ceiling was insulated and underfloor heating was installed. This caused the room height on the ground floor to shrink to about 220 cm (clear height). I believe I heard that in BW the room height has to be at least 230 cm.

I am not really bothered by the room height because you don’t hit your head even at 220 cm, but was the renovation even legally okay and what about a possible resale?

Are there any other disadvantages of such a low room height or even advantages that I might have overlooked?
 

Elina

2018-11-26 15:32:36
  • #2
The low ceilings would be a KO criterion for me. When we were house hunting, one of the first questions was how high the ceilings are. So, regarding the resale value, I would consider that a strong negative feature. As for the legal aspect, it is probably okay (without guarantee), since countless old buildings do not have the ceiling height required for new buildings and still are (can be) inhabited. I would think carefully about it.
 

nordanney

2018-11-26 16:50:12
  • #3
You are buying a house that is not allowed to be used for residential purposes (Landesbauordnung BW). For me as a banker, an unusable property whose value tends toward zero. At least that is how an appraiser must value the property.
 

blaupuma

2018-11-26 20:39:43
  • #4
2.20m absolute disaster.

We are building 2.65 m clear height, because 2.45 seemed oppressive to me. (I’m exaggerating a bit)
(I’m also almost 1.90)
 

tarmo

2018-11-26 20:41:17
  • #5
So I have now spoken with a building expert who said that the 2.30 m only applies to new buildings. For existing properties, this is completely fine. The buyer just has to decide if it suits them or not. I also measured again, the rooms are exactly 2.21 m and since everything is newly plastered and very bright, you don't get the feeling that it "crushes" you at all. And I know what I'm talking about, at the moment I live in a new building (2017) and there the room height is 2.62 m. Therefore, I find your statement that because of this the value goes to zero simply wrong.
 

blaupuma

2018-11-26 20:48:05
  • #6

st

You now live in 2.62 m and find 2.21 m not oppressive?
 

Similar topics
20.04.2018Planning luminous room height - experiences?94
02.12.2016Ceiling height in the attic is not maintained! What are my rights?21
23.11.2018Luminous room height and window height. Provider standard 262.50 cm26
30.03.2019Underfloor heating vs. room height, what should one do?23
09.04.2019Do tall doors fit a "normal" room height?20
29.09.2019Ceiling height - how much should it be?28
12.07.2020Which interior door height corresponds to which room height - collection thread48
07.10.20202.40m room height with spot lighting sufficient?13
12.11.2020Slanted window interior and too low room height?19
27.02.2023Which building regulations make new constructions so expensive?54
22.08.2024Low room height; build higher than approved?15

Oben