Remaining loan amount specifically "NBA" player bank

You already had that on page 4 ;) .

Maybe that wasn’t stated clearly enough yet. :p

This opinion is unfortunately only an opinion and moreover a wrong opinion. There is no need for a clause in the contract – what is needed is a clause that the remaining balance must NOT be paid out.

When he finally takes the notes into account and makes his statement correctly, then he has enough invoices (simply declare invested equity capital as less than the private loan). What then remains at the end can be repaid via special repayment.

That is exactly THE answer I was aiming for from the very beginning.

Oh God, it took 6 pages in this thread and your discussion until I understood the title.

That can happen when a thread starter prefers to cause confusion with the headline and this confusion is "the answer he wanted to get to from the very beginning" – which is not true at all. The understandable question – no matter whether Charles Bronson or Kermit advertises for this bank – would have been: "I want to get a little extra spending money along with my home loan – will that work, or is it only paid out step by step and purpose-bound upon proof?"
Even the terminology is confusing: "kickback bonus" (which is desired) and "remaining sum" are completely different things.

Crazy how the topic is being blown up now. But that's what I like about the forum, that the answers are honest and not sugarcoated.

Is there any way to close the topic and call it done? xD

PS: [Tektur] arrived today and we can get started. :)