Potential savings opportunity KfW 70 vs. 55 - Air heat pump

  • Erstellt am 2015-08-01 15:57:53

mading

2015-08-01 15:57:53
  • #1
Hello everyone,

We are planning to start the planning of a new building (house) soon.

Therefore, I am wondering which Kfw standard is better in terms of heating costs: is it worth investing in a KFW 55 house or is it more economical to build a Kfw 70 house (additional costs for a higher standard vs. savings potential on heating costs through better insulation).

Since we are still at the beginning, we have not yet decided between solid construction and prefabricated house. My only question is how high the savings potential of a KfW 55 house is compared to a 70er (with an air heat pump, approx. 150sqm), to justify the higher costs.

It is clear that electricity will not become cheaper.

The Energy Saving Ordinance will also be changed in April 2016 so that the 100% house will correspond to today’s still valid KfW 70 standard.

Does anyone have experience with this and can give me experiences and tips for decision-making?
 

Legurit

2015-08-01 16:21:04
  • #2
Is it so clear that electricity will not become cheaper? Actually, it should, as soon as we get storage under control... there is an overproduction. Well, but that’s not the topic.

Are you building with an architect? If you are building with a BU or GÜ, they will probably make the decision for you through their offer or pricing...
You can also simply calculate it bluntly: 20 kWh/m²a at 150 m² costs you 3000 kWh - with an annual performance factor of 3 (that’s already a good air-to-water heat pump) you then pay €23 for heating per month. At 40 kWh/m²a then €46 and at 60 kWh/m²a €70. Over 15 years, the difference amounts to €4200 + interest or €8400 + interest... from experience, the offers are always borderline economical, so depending on the consideration period, they either add up or not... so neither a total economic loss nor the investment of the millennium. I also think that the feeling of life doesn’t differ anymore – no cold walls, but also always equally airtight halls with forced ventilation.
 

mading

2015-08-01 16:47:09
  • #3
Hi,

Wow, thank you for the quick and competent response!
 

BauPaar

2015-08-25 02:03:14
  • #4
yes, actually...

Actually, public transport prices should also go down, as the number of users is rising extremely.
Actually, the solidarity surcharge can also be abolished...
And above all: actually, I'm not even hungry, but still go to eat...

I see absolutely no way for electricity prices to go down, especially as long as the grids remain privatized. Why should 'they' ruin their sources of income? If someone else does it, gladly :)
 

Similar topics
03.05.2011KfW loan okay or is there a cheaper option?10
07.10.2016Which heating is recommended for KfW 55?58
30.05.2012Massive house costs KFW 70 - Prefabricated house65
17.08.2013Financing offer - Interest okay? Your opinion...10
13.02.2015KfW Energy Efficient Building11
17.02.2015KFW funding sensible / Energy advisor, construction supervision?10
07.12.2015Heating question new building KFW 70 air heat pump + solar, ice storage?29
07.04.2016New KfW conditions from 04/201674
30.03.20162016 KfW Efficiency House 55 according to reference values (U-values)39
10.05.2016KfW funding for two-family house26
22.06.2016Is a TA loan sensible? Interest and loan offer are okay13
07.11.2016Cost estimation KfW 40+, calculation of full floors17
07.12.2016Make a special repayment or pay off the KfW loan?25
19.07.2018Which KFW standard and which technology in new construction45
15.03.2019Interest rate reduction by KfW since February 1st.13
10.08.2019KFW 40 plus / Energy-efficient building with clinker?13
04.04.2019How many KFW programs can be used?10
08.04.2019Advantages of KFW 40 Plus in General35
11.07.2019Securing interest rate for KfW 124 financing24

Oben