Could it be that the stream was "tapped"?
Both agriculture and allotment gardens always need water.
That could of course be the case, but it seems unlikely to me. On the one hand, the thing would have to be about 200m long, since the stream really is just a small stream, right? And on the other hand, between the property and the stream (besides the newly built road from 2019) there are still two other properties (one of them an old horse paddock), an older road, and a cemetery (!). If someone had dug up the latter for such a channel, it would presumably also be marked somewhere (although of course you should never say never)?
If necessary, pour concrete in. End of shaft.
But to do that I would have to know how long the thing is, so I know whether I can do it "by hand" with a concrete mixer or if I need 12 truckloads of concrete... Aside from that: is it really that simple? Pour concrete in and that’s it?
In the photos, it actually looks like an inspection shaft for an underground gutter full of water. Whatever causes that. If it was used agriculturally, the assumption of a drainage system is obvious.
Is that towards Offenbach?
No, it’s in the northwest of Frankfurt
A soil expert is also not a bad choice, at least a free consultation. But in Germany, such a structure should be documented somewhere.
If someone built the shaft/channel/gutter/whatever "illegally" who knows how many years ago, I’m not sure if it would really be documented anywhere. In any case, no one at the city was reachable today.
The seller (public authority) mentioned, by the way, that he "assumes it is a well." The thing was already on the property when the state bought it, but it was never really looked at.
I’m thinking of asking a well driller to take a look — even if it’s just to confirm that it definitely isn’t a well. Then at least I could talk to the seller about how we want to handle it. Do you think that makes sense?