Position of garage on property, specification in development plan

Hello everyone,
in our development plan, the position of the house and garage is roughly indicated in the site plan. For a better south/west orientation, we would like to place the garage not on the left side of the house, but on the right side of the house. We would like to know before commissioning a house building company whether this is possible. No specifications are made about this in the text part of the development plan. Perhaps there are already experiences in the forum with such changes/deviations from the development plan (plot 78).

Development plan/restrictions
Size of the plot - 600 sqm
Slope - 1.8 m height difference over 30 m
Site coverage ratio - 0.35
Floor area ratio - 0.5
Building window, building line and boundary - see development plan
Edge development - possible at garages
Number of parking spaces - double garage desired
Number of storeys - 2
Roof shape - WD
Style - urban villa
Orientation - see development plan
Maximum heights/limits - see development plan
Further requirements - none

Requirements of the builders
Style, roof shape, building type - urban villa with WD
, storeys - no basement
Number of persons, age - 2
Room requirements on ground floor, upper floor - 70, 70
Office: family use or home office? - guest room
Guests per year - once per month
Open or closed architecture - partly open
Conservative or modern building style - modern
Open , kitchen island - yes
Number of dining places - 6
Fireplace - no
Music/stereo wall - no
Balcony, roof terrace - no
Garage, carport - 6x9
Utility garden, greenhouse - only hedge and lawn area
Further - no wishes/special features/daily routine, gladly also reasons why this or that should not be - none

House design
Who is responsible for the planning:
- Planner of a construction company - own planning/prefabricated house provider
- Architect - not yet named
- Do-it-Yourself - no
What do you particularly like? Why? - Passage from house to garage
What do you not like? Why? -
Price estimate according to architect/planner: open
Personal price limit for the house, incl. equipment: open
Preferred heating technology: district heating

If you have to do without, which details/extensions
- can you do without: external blinds
- can you not do without: garage

Why has the design become as it is now? e.g.
Standard design from the planner? Partly
Corresponding/which wishes were implemented by the architect? Yes
A mix of many examples from various magazines... - yes
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes? - tailored to our needs

In our development plan, the position of the house and garage is roughly indicated in the location drawing. For better south/west orientation, we would like to place the garage not on the left side of the house, but on the right side of the house. Before commissioning a home building company, we would like to know whether this is possible. No requirements are made about this in the text section of the development plan. Maybe there is already experience in the forum with such changes/deviations from the development plan (plot 78)

Even though your development plan, in my view, interprets the plan drawing regulations somewhat idiosyncratically, I would not consider the symbolic drawings so binding that a waiver for this request would be necessary. However, I interpret the red lines on the light green lines at the gables of the house symbols here as building lines, meaning the development plan issuer apparently desires a uniform facade alignment of the houses (both the first and the second row). Thus, your garage could probably be moved to the upper side of the house on the plan – but without the house being allowed to shift "downwards" on the plan for this purpose [Attached I have transferred your plan section from the "hijacked" thread here].

"Before commissioning a home building company" sounds to me somewhat like you want to entrust yourselves to the proven questionable hands of a provider-owned draftsman, behind which I would like to place a faint question mark. By the way, it is a pity that despite commendable completion of the questionnaire, you do not immediately also show the house design.

The red and green lines probably have to do with noise protection


But I see in the roof drawings the strained desire for photovoltaic optimization

I had to transfer 700 euros to the district office for a similar deviation from the development plan. And I had to wait 8 weeks for the approval.

I took a look at it in the map. It seems that almost any deviation is possible in the building area. You have a height difference of 2.2 m diagonally across the property and in the building itself it is about 90 cm.

Even though, in my opinion, your development plan interprets the planning drawing regulations somewhat idiosyncratically, I would not consider the symbolic markings to be so binding that a dispensation would be necessary for this request to deviate. However, I interpret the red lines on the light green lines at the gables of the house symbols here as building lines, i.e. the developer apparently wants a uniform facade alignment of the houses (both the first and the second row). Thus, your garage could probably be switched to the upper side of the house according to the plan - but without the house moving "downwards" on the plan for that [Attached I have transferred your plan excerpt from the "hijacked" thread here].

"Before commissioning a house building company" already sounds to me somewhat like you want to entrust yourself to the tried-and-questionable hands of a provider-owned draftsman, behind which I would like to draw a subtle question mark. By the way, it's a pity that despite your commendable completion of the questionnaire, you did not also show the house design right away.

That’s how we would like it. Unfortunately, I was only able to draw a gable roof in the program, but it should be a hip roof.