Photovoltaic system at the multi-family house. 100% approval from the homeowners' association?

  • Erstellt am 2021-09-02 16:31:44

nordanney

2021-09-02 21:25:20
  • #1
I told you. Since the reform, a simple majority. It’s not something I came up with.

Regarding the costs:
    [*]The costs of the renovation are borne by the owners who agreed to the renovation measure. [*]If the renovation measure is decided with more than two-thirds of the votes cast and more than half of the co-ownership shares, according to § 21 para. 2 sentence 1 no. 1 WEG, all owners bear the costs – except if the structural change is disproportionately expensive. [*]According to § 21 para. 2 sentence 1 no. 2 WEG, all owners also bear the costs if the renovation measure amortizes within a reasonable period. An important reference point for this is the 10-year period applicable to modernizing repairs.
 

pkiensch

2021-09-02 21:28:17
  • #2

that's why the quote in the post :)

the thing about it being a matter of opinion referred to the "I see it differently" before.
 

HabneFrage

2021-09-02 21:29:34
  • #3
The questioner is not concerned with renovation, but with the installation of a photovoltaic system! Here, he clearly asked whether all owners must agree when acquiring a photovoltaic system! It has nothing to do with renovation. Therefore, I cannot imagine that a simple majority - as with a renovation - is sufficient in this case!
 

nordanney

2021-09-02 21:52:08
  • #4
It's not about "imagining" or believing. That's how it is stated in the law. Energy renovation. Period.
 

HabneFrage

2021-09-02 21:57:07
  • #5
A photovoltaic system is not an energy renovation... Oh man. Oh man. He clearly writes "in addition to a renovation" a photovoltaic system is to be acquired... The renovation will probably be the facade. Photovoltaics are separate here! Renovation is clear. Simple majority of owners. But I see the point "acquisition of a photovoltaic system" differently. Here all owners must agree. A simple majority like for a facade renovation, for example, is not enough here.
 

fraubauer

2021-09-03 09:55:53
  • #6
Thank you very much for the answers. I now have the necessary information. So a simple majority is sufficient, but the system must also "pay off" within 10 years. If this is not the case, the system can be stopped by a veto from an owner. Not a simple topic. A large photovoltaic system would also significantly change the appearance of the house (major intervention). And not everyone is keen on having a photovoltaic system on their roof...
 

Similar topics
05.03.2010Passive house, heating combination with solar, energy recovery, photovoltaics?38
22.12.2015Is natural stone heating in combination with a photovoltaic system reasonable?16
09.04.2013Is financing a photovoltaic system unprofitable?11
08.12.2014Small photovoltaic system 2 KWp11
12.02.2015Photovoltaic systems & storage systems *collective thread*21
05.06.2015Photovoltaic system for hot water preparation and feed-in15
06.08.2015Photovoltaics for hot water26
20.11.2015Solar / Photovoltaic from an economic perspective53
08.01.2016Photovoltaic system: Self-consumption rate with battery and further questions27
23.02.2016Photovoltaic + Battery - Which System - Experiences?17
08.06.2017Photovoltaic system, how to use experiences like heat pumps?64
26.04.201616.03.16: Start of photovoltaic assembly60
16.07.2016KfW 40+ and 10,000 Houses Program - Requirements for Photovoltaics?13
06.04.2016Financing for 15 or 20 years? Photovoltaics via KFW?10
30.05.2016KfW55: Gas or air-water heat pump with/without photovoltaics17
30.05.2016Photovoltaics on the roof as a second layer11
21.06.2016Heat pump with photovoltaics vs gas and solar thermal52
10.07.2016Air-water heat pump with photovoltaics or pellet with solar25
13.07.2016Photovoltaic storage - experiences? Tips?17
10.10.2017New photovoltaic system with storage in single-family home - experiences39

Oben