nordanney
2024-07-09 20:08:08
- #1
First of all, the house makes a good impression and is fairly energy-efficient (despite oil). But it is still 30 years old. That is the time when many things “get old” (heating, windows, roof, outdated bathrooms, etc.). Pool, sauna, etc., are nice to have but actually don’t add decisive value to a normal property. In addition, the hillside plot is oversized and not optimally usable (stairs, terraces). The location is in a cow village, although fairly close to Dingolfing. Finally, I looked at other properties in the area. No, I did not calculate anything but only made an assessment and compared. Based on that, my 30 years of experience tells me the price could be a bit too high. Just for comparison: a light-flooded architect’s house in a dream location in Dingolfing. Otherwise, some of the somewhat smaller houses locally (110 sqm new build from 2020 with corresponding quality for 500k or 121 sqm house from 1989 with 733 sqm plot and some renovations done for 400k). Based on that, my opinion. In numbers, maybe roughly calculated backwards: land value €200k (800 sqm at €200, rest garden strip). Then €500k remain for 196 sqm house including garden/cellar. If we subtract €50k for the useful cellar, €450k remain for the house = €2,230/sqm living space. That is about 1/3 below today’s production costs. With 100 years of useful life, that would roughly fit the depreciation. But it is not a new building, rather existing property in the countryside. Therefore, the value would slightly go down.You roughly estimated it, but can you explain a bit more precisely how you arrived at that assessment?