Legal aspects of planning preliminary services from prefabricated house providers

  • Erstellt am 2017-02-01 16:34:01

11ant

2017-02-03 16:01:45
  • #1
Of course, no architect has copyrights on "living downstairs, sleeping upstairs," 8.74 x 11.615 external dimensions with 30° SD or the like. But on the actual execution plan, yes, even if it does not reinvent the wheel.

Purchase options for manufacturer plans are unusual. Every house manufacturer also has their own construction and cannot simply adopt the execution plans anyway. Changes to them are no less laborious than developing the details based on a scribble. Taking a photocopy of the plan in the catalog to a competitor and asking "what would this cost with you?" is not reprehensible. As far as basic ideas for room layouts are concerned, the variants are manageable at least for compact building bodies of simple basic form.

How many house providers have stolen design suggestions on their websites (frequently "borrowed" from Hebel or Ytong among the solid builders) is hard to count. With most providers, I get the impression that they always come up with exactly the same color combination of white / gray / red for the facades. Also, though it is a gable roof, flat roof dormers are such a fashion trend that implies little original creative effort. Probably also often with the intention of being able to pilfer sample photos of bestsellers from many competitors. Copyrights do exist nevertheless, but for example, no one really "thought up first" (which is what creating means) this common color combination.
 
Oben