11ant
2021-10-29 16:06:10
- #1
Exactly. Where there is no difference, there can be no disadvantage either. I am (with the "normal" - i.e. Energy Saving Ordinance or KfW55 - house) also not "pro 'prefabricated' house," but on the other hand also against the fundamental rejection, because the onsite-built solid masonry house is equally equivalent. However, it appliesI just don't see any advantage in timber frame... whether I have a solid construction built in 10 months or wait 12 months for the production of a wooden house is basically the same in the end
only under the condition of the "normal" standard. With KfW40, the step from the standard there is usually noticeably smaller with the timber frame panel builders than with the masons. Otherwise, it is indeed true that "with the same equipment there is no fundamental price difference."and probably almost the same price