Jochen104
2015-01-12 20:40:56
- #1
No, it usually isn’t. And that is also the reason why exactly that usually doesn’t work.
There are only 2 (3) cases where this applies.
1) Liability exemption of KFW for the intermediary institute. But that doesn’t exist with 124/151/153 etc.
2) The bank somehow includes the risk costs of the KFW loan already in the first-ranking condition, so that a corresponding surcharge is already applied there.
3) The bank can’t do the math.
Then I have to inquire this week. I remembered it differently.