toxicmolotof
2017-02-21 13:38:23
- #1
Those who can read are clearly at an advantage. I did not see the thing with Bayern in [TT].
why should the target remain in the year 2051? Then they’ll just finish three years later, no problem at that age, but have 34 years of more relaxed installments.
No one can predict how the costs will develop. When I think of all the articles from last week that say at the latest in a year there will be a bubble burst at least in the metropolitan areas, prices for real estate could also have gone down. ->Crystal ball
I can see, people here don’t agree either
I can already see, there’s no consensus here either
@Casper so a monthly savings rate of 1800 is too little and after three years there will still be a net loss?
Similar topics | ||
16.06.2020 | Loan-to-value ratio and property purchase in cash? | 12 |
25.08.2022 | Price increase despite fixed price! | 56 |