House construction with multiplier > 30?

  • Erstellt am 2018-12-21 12:09:11

nordanney

2018-12-24 14:01:35
  • #1

Value is identical, as it is a pure asset value object. Possibly a small deduction due to the notice period for termination for personal use.


Now you are comparing apples and oranges. A 4-family house (unrented) is not an owner-occupied property. Here, the focus is on the yield. Therefore, the value is calculated using the income approach. Value is identical except for an underrent due to the rental period compared to a rented multi-family house.

Unfortunately, I have to disagree with you due to professional reasons...
 

Zaba12

2018-12-24 14:10:11
  • #2
Multiplier :-p. Awesome. For an investment property, it definitely makes sense to think that way. But for private use, rather not, otherwise you will either have to build completely lean (like waste reduction) or not at all.

By the way, you are the first person in my 2.5 years here who thinks and writes something like that. :-D. *laughs*
 

HilfeHilfe

2018-12-24 14:41:32
  • #3
I have been 30% richer on paper since moving in 2014. Andnu
 

fab101

2018-12-24 15:21:44
  • #4
: that's nice for you at first. But as book value, actually irrelevant. But if you had to / wanted to sell, not quite so...

: I don't think it's wrong to consider an economic aspect alongside emotional ones ("infrared cabin" or not...). If this is the exception here, that's okay. Might not matter at all in the big city with construction boom and bubble. Here in the province, it's different.

: thank you very much for your contribution.
 

Fuchur

2018-12-24 15:45:40
  • #5

well, quite simple: move out right now! :D
 

HilfeHilfe

2018-12-24 15:45:49
  • #6

Since I account for my house at historical acquisition cost and not at fair value, it really doesn't matter
 
Oben