Post #7
Then it’s worth switching the house provider! Reasonable house providers also have planners. One might be less committed than the other, but the line drawing doesn’t exactly inspire confidence. To be honest, I skimmed over this post with the line drawing because it had too many childish aspects (especially the original drawing).
But I also have to be honest and say that you want to save money on an architect but still want an architect’s house. That usually doesn’t work. You cannot replace a trained professional. You are trying to draw the magic all-in-one solution for yourself and forget the priorities of a house design. You want to spend €370,000 but don’t want to treat yourself to an expert.
Okay. Typified house = a standard floorplan? So it’s not as if we didn’t research. We are open to being shown an example that fulfills our wishes.
Since captain’s and Frisian houses are naturally designed symmetrically, which usually come with a simple spiral staircase at the entrance, the combination with a different staircase is not so easy to find online.
Since I can also imagine the front door on the short side for the plot or the third gable as a large window front in the southwest, I’ll throw the Lichthaus 152 from Town & Country into the mix
[ATTACH alt="Bildschirmfoto 2020-03-08 um 19.38.33.png" type="full"]43937[/ATTACH]
Or a Baumeister house, Haus Denker. Although here I would rather see the entrance in the northwest, meaning the house turned.
[ATTACH alt="Bildschirmfoto 2020-03-08 um 19.39.58.png" type="full"]43938[/ATTACH]
Or the Maxime 700, but mirrored...
[ATTACH alt="Bildschirmfoto 2020-03-08 um 20.03.00.png" type="full"]43939[/ATTACH]
Otherwise, I would just look at the dimensions of normal one-story houses with a 1-meter KS. Imagining a gable is doable.
Two windows cannot be installed because of the roof.
Those would be the two children’s room windows in the normal gables. The two rooms hardly have standing height.
Still, I don’t know what your day-to-day life looks like, but ours definitely does not only consist of walking between the kitchen and dining room.
No, but many other components (e.g. as you listed) don’t have to be considered in a house design. Everyone has to eat. As a second priority, one should probably name the nighttime path from the bed to the toilet on the upper floor – that shouldn’t be too convoluted.
We currently have a 180-degree spiral staircase and find it unpleasant every day to walk on these narrow tapering steps. Hence the desire for a landing staircase.
Spiral staircases are out of the question for comparison anyway. A landing staircase is expensive and takes up space, and you choose it because you want it. For the appearance, for example. The landing itself is a small tripping hazard because the walking rhythm is interrupted... this has nothing to do with narrow steps, since a staircase is subject to standards and one can calculate the step length over the rise by calculation.
But whatever... I don’t want to persuade you here. You asked, you get answers... what you make of it, e.g. sugar-coating all things or rejecting good tips as if they came unsolicited, is your thing.
P.S. And why an office shouldn’t get evening sun, I don’t understand either.