Hello questioner.
Here are the answers to your questions:
If you want an optically homogeneous surface in so-called "concrete look," you will not be really happy with any of your suggestions!
And this for understandable reasons.
The Pandomo system, as well as the "TopCiment" consisting of a cement dispersion, are mineral-bound systems that ultimately have different absorbency after curing. Pandomo is usually treated with a so-called stone oil, which inevitably (due to the different absorbency of the cement surface) causes different penetration depths.
This means that optically cloud-like, differently visible areas arise, which have nothing to do with "optical uniformity," but are unavoidable from a craft perspective.
The Rheobond from Chemotechnik Abstatt is known to me from various large projects, most recently in Berlin.
Rheobond is a classic industrial coating, as used for hall floors but also in commercial buildings. A condition for an optically appealing surface is machine smoothing and thereby uniform structural consolidation. This cannot be accomplished in small rooms (residential objects); manual work is necessary due to protruding room corners, etc. Such surfaces treated with an impregnation (here: OBTEGO) create strong cloud-like shadows with varying intense effects (see photo on the right).
A rotary sander had to be used on the left of the picture to smooth the surface before applying impregnation. You can also see this.
For an industrial coating these features would be completely irrelevant, in large projects it leads to disputes but ultimately must be accepted; in private rooms, you cannot accept such a final appearance.

The tendency to scratch cannot be excluded with Pandomo as well as with TopCiment.
If you want an optically flawless, i.e., homogeneous appearance, you will not avoid a pigmented sealing, for example in RAL 7046.
There are abrasion-resistant material systems available that do not yellow and still serve their purpose for many years.
You must always be aware that such floor systems, as you have listed, are so-called "unique floors." How they look afterwards depends on several aspects.
DIN-A4 sized sample areas do not help either (see photo 1), they are also unsuitable as legally secure evidence in case of a dispute to demonstrate optical inequalities.
We are not even talking about suitability for underfloor heating or compressive strength of the systems, as all systems fulfill the necessary requirements.
The decision is now yours. As my last remark on this: the term "concrete look" is meaningless. A concrete look as known to me from professional practice and also usual, you certainly do not want to find in the residential area.
----------------------------
Regards: KlaRa