Yes, quite interesting. But no surprise or even twist. It was already mentioned on the other pages.
The contract states "The basement construction must be officially reported as finished at least 12 weeks before house installation in writing." Whether these 12 weeks are to be added on top of the minimum 23 weeks is not yet entirely clear to me.
Actually, I am only interested in experience reports from people who have sued their house builder for delays, with or without a claim for damages. Assessing the prospects of success.
Best regards and thanks for your experience report!
I have legal expenses insurance specifically for home builders.
That's exactly what I would want to decide myself. (Whether the case is comparable)
For me, it is now interesting whether there is hope to prevail in a legal dispute, whether merely sending a lawyer first triggers the desired reaction (as in the motor vehicle damages area, where attempts are generally made to settle with a lower compensation) or whether I am throwing good money after bad here.
Yes, I have one. :) (Legal expenses insurance)
If there had been even one person here who had taken the legal route like in my case, it would only take a few minutes to get oriented. No big waste of time.
... to afford a lawsuit.
... it is time-saving to have the next, second step already prepared. And again ITS consequences. (meaning the lawsuit)
The decision-maker has recovered again and has taken responsibility for the delays and has recognized that our situation is as absurd as I described it in the first post. His two representatives were not brave/competent/experienced enough to review and correct the routine taken.
The execution plan for the basement will be created immediately and handed over to me. The sampling will only take place afterwards. Thus, the usual order will be deviated from. Sounds simple, but so far the responsible parties were not willing to do so. Stress.