why is it not even allowed to basically get a little information
One may and should, as long as one sufficiently takes the nature of the question into account. This is a legal question with considerable significance; incorrect actions can easily have the opposite effect of what is intended. There is little room here for chit-chat prose, especially the less concrete knowledge one has. The information from the OP is rather sparse. Then answers that are so "unlegal" from snippets of some articles or similar... that doesn't work. Dieter Nuhr would apply here.
you yourself twist the law and don’t like it if people can get information without collecting money?
Sure. It can be done, I have no objection. Lawyers earn especially well when people do not inform themselves but trust forum members who appear professionally skilled. These processes will generate really great contributions towards overhead while a consultation or contract review can barely cover costs.
it’s never about legal advice in a forum, but about informational advice.
Exactly. And this also means that the OP may read your post, but I inform him that he should get properly INFORMED. Or do you assume liability for the content of your post? I rather don’t think so.
there are always some experts here in the forum (like you, voki), who weigh every word on a gold plate
…gold scale…
simple (maybe only 99% correct) answers without reasoning (how hollow is that!) want to be shredded in the air in an insulting manner
If it’s 99%, no problem. If it’s far below that and also extremely incomplete, then I add some other information to those “information.”
I don’t insult anyone. That always takes two. Besides, I am usually much more concrete and direct. Here I was actually still gentle... at least I didn’t call you a troll. That’s something already.
absolutely right until the Last Judgment
I very much hope it doesn’t come to that at the “gate” now. Many people in the forum orient themselves by tips and hints. That has something to do with “black on white.” If no one contradicts, many would rely on relative nonsense and could fall flat on their faces. Doesn’t have to, but can and will.
it’s only about general basic knowledge and a tendency
If it really was basic “knowledge,” that would be okay. Here it’s more… let’s call it “gut feeling.”
factually correct revealed
Factually correct... revealed? (Now I really have to grin)
I just find it stupid of people like you to insult every comment with some kind of informal value
I did not. 1. I cannot recognize any insult and 2. your posts had no informal value, at least none significant that one could leave as is, if you set aside the final recommendation to see a notary.
no wonder nothing’s going on here if every thread actually ends with insults.
What should be “going on” here? I find an informative forum with a manageable number of topics and high-quality answers much more important and better than a forum with many silly posts, where few people care about the professionally wrong answers. I find the forum nicely clear and reasonably well structured.
I also like that trolls, troublemakers, and other crazies somehow do not last very long here. That’s because it’s uncomfortable and too many members clearly oppose these persons.
Building and buying a house are such complex topics in factual and legal respects that the vast majority of interested parties can only fully understand a few areas without intensively engaging with the subject matter. For that, posting and reading here in the forum is allowed, possible, and should be done. In most cases, there are some good suggestions, tips, and also a little criticism. The latter is necessary, because people tend to get stuck where they really want to. It’s a bit like being in love… the rose-colored glasses and such. It’s human but sometimes requires the power of reason to be distracted from emotion.
Even now, I was sweet as sugar again... and I can really be different.