half a year later...
An expert with their own laboratory examined three "core drilling" samples and came to the following result:
According to the expert's statement, the applied plaster build-up does not correspond to the one required in the specifications. This requires a (high-quality) medium- to thick-layered plaster system with a layer thickness of 15-18mm (of which 10mm is top plaster). What was applied was a rather thin-layered plaster system with thicknesses of 4.5 to 11mm. The applied plaster thicknesses significantly influence the resistance to fungi and algae; the facade has significant microbiological infestation.
Furthermore, a functionally different plaster system was used. The specifications called for a 10mm "water-absorbing" top plaster, but "water-repellent" was applied. The expert explained the differences between the systems in that the dew point of the required system lies within the plaster, whereas in the one used, it lies on the outside. "We ordered a Porsche but got an Opel."
In addition, the high-quality paint applied (silica sol silicate) does not fit this plaster system and its only function is to "adhere."
When asked about renovation options, the expert could not suggest any solution. (He previously worked himself in a development department for plaster systems).
Good (or not) ... we will now report this as a defect through our lawyer.
What renovation options do you see?
Greetings and have a nice day!!